Page 1 of 1

308 vs 7.62

Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2015 11:18 am
by ghostrider
Interesting image I found showing differences between .308Win and 7.62x51 (aka 7.62 NATO):


http://tinypic.com/r/1qfrr9/8" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Re: 308 vs 7.62

Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2015 11:29 am
by Kadelic
Thanks for this useful info. A .308 or 7.62x51 chambered rifle is on the top of my "next gun" list. I thought the compatibility with the NATO round versus the "civilian" round would be the same as with the .223/5.56x45 rounds. Turns out it's the opposite. Very good to know!

Re: 308 vs 7.62

Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2015 11:34 am
by android
I think many AR style 7.62 rifles will handle both.

I have a Ruger SR-762 and it lists both rounds.

Caliber: 308 Win / 7.62 NATO

It's always best to check what is stamped on the barrel.

Re: 308 vs 7.62

Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2015 11:39 am
by ghostrider
In a previous life when I owned an L1A1 (FN FAL) I used 308 and 7.62 brass interchangeably, but I also never loaded at or near maximum loads.

YMMV with different semi-auto rifles.

Re: 308 vs 7.62

Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2015 9:45 am
by GeekwithaGun
My Armalite AR-10 is stamped 7.62 NATO on the receiver and the owners manual show it will fire both .308 and 7.62x51mm

Re: 308 vs 7.62

Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2015 11:25 am
by TomsTXCHL
Good grief OTTOMH I thought it was exactly the other way around--that a .308 firearm would not necessarily like "higher pressures of the 7.62x51".

Must be getting old.

:oops:

Re: 308 vs 7.62

Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2015 4:30 pm
by MeMelYup
TomsTXCHL wrote:Good grief OTTOMH I thought it was exactly the other way around--that a .308 firearm would not necessarily like "higher pressures of the 7.62x51".

Must be getting old.

:oops:
The M1 was the same way. Hunting rifled would shoot all military ammo plus hunting loads, but there were cautions against using machine gun and some hunting loads in the M1 because of pressure.

Re: 308 vs 7.62

Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2015 12:45 am
by ghostrider
Interestingly, my new FAL is stamped:

7.62 (.308 win)

I ordered some 7.62mm once-fired brass for reloading plus tools to remove the primer crimp. At the moment I plan to keep my 308 (bolt-action) and 7.62 NATO (FAL) brass and reloads separate.

I neck-size for the bolt action, which won't likely work for the semi-auto (luckily I already have a full-length resizing die).

Re: 308 vs 7.62

Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2015 5:18 pm
by MeMelYup
Here is some basic ballistics for 308. http://www.ballistics101.com/308_winchester.php" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The base military/NATO round was 147g to 150g FMJ, FMJBT.

Re: 308 vs 7.62

Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2015 11:36 pm
by ghostrider
some more related links:

http://www.thegunzone.com/30cal.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.fulton-armory.com/%5Cfaqs%5C ... %5C308.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://how-i-did-it.org/762vs308/chamber.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.ballisticallyspeaking.com/th ... s-223.225/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

edited to add:

http://www.303british.com/id36.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Re: 308 vs 7.62

Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2015 11:12 pm
by ghostrider
some disagreement here about what's in the image:

http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2015 ... s-7-62x51/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Re: 308 vs 7.62

Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2015 9:12 am
by Rvrrat14
ghostrider wrote:some disagreement here about what's in the image:

http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2015 ... s-7-62x51/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
This has been my understanding........longer leade in the chamber. But, pressure remains higher in 308 due to shorter chamber leade. 223 vs 5.56, 6.8 vs 6.8 SPC II ,etc.

My 308 Auto shoots both fine.