Page 1 of 1
An interesting interaction with a Game Warden
Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2015 11:21 pm
by cprems
I had an interesting interaction with a Texas Game Warden while fishing today.
He was checking licenses on the bank and we started chatting. I had a question regarding CHL and the COE. Where I was fishing (North Bosque river) is a grey area (IMHO) as to the application of COE rules and regulations and the defined area.
So, I asked him "What are the rules regarding CHL and carrying here?" His answer shocked me! Now I was not carrying at the time due to a possible COE violation.
He stated that the Game Wardens encourage and WANT CHL holders to carry while fishing. He also stated that about 3 years ago, COE has deferred to the State in requirements for gun laws and carrying. He said it was perfectly legal for CHL holders to carry at Lake Waco. Now this source was ONE Game Warden so I really don't know where it stands legally for the lake but I will be carrying tomorrow when I go fishing.
I thought it was an interesting conversation indeed.
What do y'all think?
Re: An interesting interaction with a Game Warden
Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2015 12:17 am
by PBR
I have wondered the same myself as too carrying on San Jacinto River or Trinity Bay while in a boat, two main places I go fishing. I have wondered but haven't ever found an answer looking around but also haven't asked the question either.
Edited: also what does COE stand for (I'm not too up on all the abbreviations) -- guessing carrying openly
Re: An interesting interaction with a Game Warden
Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2015 12:31 am
by LeakyWaders
PBR wrote:Edited: also what does COE stand for (I'm not too up on all the abbreviations) -- guessing carrying openly
COE = Corps of Engineers
Re: An interesting interaction with a Game Warden
Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2015 8:14 am
by treadlightly
I believe you can carry in national parks, as allowed by the state they are in, just not in the buildings. Like the Post Office, they are off limits.
But since the Post Office is a corporation, not a government agency, I don't understand the fuss over the Post Office.
Re: An interesting interaction with a Game Warden
Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2015 8:41 am
by Glockster
I myself have never seen anything that says that the COE follows any state's laws. The only thing that I know of is the below, which is from their still current "Rules and Regulations Governing Public Use of Corps of Engineers Water Resources Development Projects."
327.13 Explosives, firearms, other weapons and fireworks.
(a) The possession of loaded firearms, ammunition, loaded projectile firing devices, bows and arrows, crossbows, or other weapons is prohibited unless:
(1) In the possession of a Federal, state or local law enforcement officer;
(2) Being used for hunting or fishing as permitted under 327.8, with devices being unloaded when transported to, from or between hunting and fishing sites;
(3) Being used at authorized shooting ranges; or
(4) Written permission has been received from the District Commander.
(b) Possession of explosives or explosive devices of any kind, including fireworks or other pyrotechnics, is prohibited unless written permission has been received from the District Commander.
Re: An interesting interaction with a Game Warden
Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2015 8:49 am
by RoyGBiv
cprems wrote:What do y'all think?
I think I would be certain to make a record of the Warden's name, badge number, time and location of the conversation and save it in case I ever got into any trouble with the COE regs.
Re: An interesting interaction with a Game Warden
Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2015 8:58 am
by Glockster
RoyGBiv wrote:cprems wrote:What do y'all think?
I think I would be certain to make a record of the Warden's name, badge number, time and location of the conversation and save it in case I ever got into any trouble with the COE regs.
I'd love to be shown incorrect, but my understanding is that game wardens in a state can enforce those related laws as COE authorizes fishing IAW state fishing laws. But I don't believe that COE has granted any authority to a game warden to enforce any states firearms laws. In short, I don't think that having any game warden information would be of benefit given that LEO would be following 327.13 which prohibits firearms.
Re: An interesting interaction with a Game Warden
Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2015 9:28 am
by cb1000rider
cprems wrote: He also stated that about 3 years ago, COE has deferred to the State in requirements for gun laws and carrying.?
"Where can I find out more about that policy?"
Re: An interesting interaction with a Game Warden
Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2015 10:03 am
by C-dub
FMI, for my information, if Game Wardens are not capable of enforcing COE regulations, who does that fall to? This GW seems to think he would be able to enforce them.
Re: An interesting interaction with a Game Warden
Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2015 10:05 am
by C-dub
cb1000rider wrote:cprems wrote: He also stated that about 3 years ago, COE has deferred to the State in requirements for gun laws and carrying.?
"Where can I find out more about that policy?"
I don't remember the bill number, but I think BO signed it into law as an amendment tacked onto some credit card thing during his first term.
EDIT: Found it.
http://www.nps.gov/maca/learn/managemen ... etails.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: An interesting interaction with a Game Warden
Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2015 10:20 am
by Keith B
C-dub wrote:cb1000rider wrote:cprems wrote: He also stated that about 3 years ago, COE has deferred to the State in requirements for gun laws and carrying.?
"Where can I find out more about that policy?"
I don't remember the bill number, but I think BO signed it into law as an amendment tacked onto some credit card thing during his first term.
EDIT: Found it.
http://www.nps.gov/maca/learn/managemen ... etails.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
This is only for National Park Service parks, not Corps of Engineers lands. Some COE districts may be unofficially following the policy as well, but it is not written into their rules or laws.
Re: An interesting interaction with a Game Warden
Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2015 10:28 am
by C-dub
Keith B wrote:C-dub wrote:cb1000rider wrote:cprems wrote: He also stated that about 3 years ago, COE has deferred to the State in requirements for gun laws and carrying.?
"Where can I find out more about that policy?"
I don't remember the bill number, but I think BO signed it into law as an amendment tacked onto some credit card thing during his first term.
EDIT: Found it.
http://www.nps.gov/maca/learn/managemen ... etails.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
This is only for National Park Service parks, not Corps of Engineers lands. Some COE districts may be unofficially following the policy as well, but it is not written into their rules or laws.
I figured that might have been what that GW was referring to. I remember a narrowly failed attempt to fix this couple years ago.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/05/08/se ... n-control/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Hopefully, they will have a better outcome this time. The biggest problem will still be in getting BO to sign it if it reaches his desk.
http://www.guns.com/2015/02/02/bills-fi ... n-on-guns/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;