Ed4032 wrote:The Annoyed Man wrote:G.A. Heath wrote:I am personally burned on Gen4 9mm Glocks, Three Guide rods, lots of frustration, and some other issues I just can't bring myself to say nice things about them. I am certain they got the springs right finally, but after my experiences I just wouldn't own another. 9mm Gen4's are in my opinion Glocks attempt to replicate Hipoint's quality.
Oh good gravy!

You know that God hears you when you speak like that!!!

Yes but remember we are talking about Glock, so comparing it to a Hi-Point seems legit to me. They are ugly and smell bad. They come from a former communist county. Get your self a real gun. An American gun. Get a S&W M&P. The very best!!
OK, I'll bite.... As a 1911 guy at heart, I agree that Glocks are ugly. So are Humvees, but they work. As for smelling bad, I don't know about you, but I keep all my guns' butts wiped and practice good gun hygiene. Mine don't smell. As for being made in a "communist country", Austria was divided into 5 zones of responsibility by the Allies, just like Germany was, at the end of WW2, with
part of it where Glock was
eventually established falling under Soviet rule. But understand, the Austrians never
willingly were part of the USSR. It was merely their fate as a conquered land..... and it was only part of the USSR's dominion from 1945 to 1955. Glock was established in 1963, 8 years
after Austria emerged from an uninvited Soviet rul. It
has, like most of western Europe, socialist leanings. In fact, that portion of the Wehrmacht whose members were of Austrian origins were not only vehemently anti-communist (as were most of Germany's officer corps), but in the last week or so of the war, there are well-documented instances of Austrian (and German) troops fighting alongside American troops against German SS troops (read "The Last Battle"). So
willingly "communist"? Nope. Not ever.
Also, Glock's famous proprietary "Tennifer" coating cannot be produced in the United States due to....you guessed it....EPA regulations. A few Glock 17s are actually manufactured at the Glock assembly plant in Smyrna, Georgia, but those have slides with a more gray finish on them, as Glock had to modify their "Tennifer" coating to comply with EPA standards. There is speculation that the US variant of Tennifer is nothing more than the same melonite found on other manufacturer's guns. The US manufactured guns have an 8 digit serial number, instead of the 7 digit numbers on the Austrian guns, and they are marked with "USA" instead of "AUSTRIA" on the slide.
Personally, I don't care about the finish or where it is made. I drive a 2015 4Runner manufactured in Japan. We have an Austrian made Glock 19, and the finish is particularly tough and durable—I've actually dropped the gun accidentally once onto bare gravel at a range, and it came up pristine—but I also own Melonite coated guns in the form of an M&P45 Full Sized and a Kahr PM9...... which brings me to your statement about the M&P.....
So, I already
have experience with the M&P pistol, and it is a good pistol. But if I wanted another one, I wouldn't have started this thread. I wouldn't mind another one, but the reason I am looking at Glocks has more to do with getting another pistol in a platform with which my wife is already familiar - as the G19 we already own is hers, not mine. It happens to be the case, in
our marriage, that my wife shoots and carries a firearm, but she is not an enthusiast like I am. Although the Glock 19 is hers, her EDC is a Kahr CW9. I am familiar with the G19, and even carry it on occasion, but I also own (and carry) a number of other pistols. It is the path of least resistance to acquire another Glock which my wife is already comfortable with, than it would be to acquire a completely different platform that she is
not familiar with, and then have to go to the trouble of making her so.