TexasCHLforum.com

After 28 years, Secret Service posts warning signs: No guns in White House
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/poli ... /80078558/


Secret Service Finally Adds ‘No Guns’ Sign at White House
http://time.com/4217144/secret-service- ... ite-house/


More News Reports
https://news.google.com/news/story?cf=a ... &scoring=d

I guess someone finally read all the way to the bottom of 18/930 and realized all entrances had to be posted.

jmorris wrote:I guess someone finally read all the way to the bottom of 18/930 and realized all entrances had to be posted.

Part of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act. The Secret Service is very forward thinking.

They missed the first President Clinton. They're just getting ready for the second.

Last time I checked, civilians could NOT carry in DC. So who is it that the secret service thinks is going to read, and heed, the new signs?

JustSomeOldGuy wrote:Last time I checked, civilians could NOT carry in DC. So who is it that the secret service thinks is going to read, and heed, the new signs?

Criminals and terrorists will most certainly obey a sign.

Gee, I thought handguns were banned up there?

JustSomeOldGuy wrote:Last time I checked, civilians could NOT carry in DC. So who is it that the secret service thinks is going to read, and heed, the new signs?

DC Police: 44 Concealed Carry Permits Approved From 206 Applicants

RoyGBiv wrote:

JustSomeOldGuy wrote:Last time I checked, civilians could NOT carry in DC. So who is it that the secret service thinks is going to read, and heed, the new signs?

DC Police: 44 Concealed Carry Permits Approved From 206 Applicants

So if they issued at the same rate, there are now 60+ people the sign could apply to in DC.

JustSomeOldGuy wrote:

RoyGBiv wrote:

JustSomeOldGuy wrote:Last time I checked, civilians could NOT carry in DC. So who is it that the secret service thinks is going to read, and heed, the new signs?

DC Police: 44 Concealed Carry Permits Approved From 206 Applicants

So if they issued at the same rate, there are now 60+ people the sign could apply to in DC.

Twitter:

@SecretService Did you put a "No guns sign" at @Whitehouse to keep @FBI from arresting @HillaryClinton? https://t.co/O7TaEnKcXp #2A

rtschl wrote:

JustSomeOldGuy wrote:Last time I checked, civilians could NOT carry in DC. So who is it that the secret service thinks is going to read, and heed, the new signs?

Criminals and terrorists will most certainly obey a sign.

Well, they did post "No Terrorist" signs didn't they?

Gotta watch out for the terriorists also.
https://youtu.be/RqcL-y457Ds

No guns are allowed, but somehow intruders can be inside. Allowed or not Allowed, does really matter? They are already in. So said Hillary Clinton.

Even Capital Police are disarmed at the security entrance. So who does these signs apply too?

Doing what they can to keep the Muslim Socialist in the Oval Office safe.

Since a federal marshal is the only one that can arrest a sitting president, maybe the signs are for the marshal service!