TexasCHLforum.com

http://pix11.com/2016/01/31/store-owner ... methrower/

I will now refer to Gun Control as Gun Centralization. A person smarter than me pointed out that guns are required for gun control. (you need guns to get the gun owners to turn over their guns) Thus, it is not Gun Control but Gun Centralization. Gun Centralization takes guns and puts them in the hands of only two groups Criminals and the Government. Thus it is Gun Centralization.

In this case the first group, the criminals, robbed a store using their guns. The store owner fought back with an improvised flame thrower. However, he eventually fled and his store was robbed. I did not say if he was arrested for resisting the robbery.

Hillary is for Gun Centralization, just in case you were not aware and were not planning to vote in the upcoming presidential election.

Centralization or concentration of power

Bitter Clinger wrote:

I LIKE IT!

The upcoming election will decide many things for the nation. If HRC is elected, you can expect an active, aggressive and hostile anti-gun and extra-Constitutional regime that sees few limits on its power.

Individually, we may need to make choices that could make us into criminals in the eyes of the regime. The unfortunate question arises regarding the legitimacy and authority of that "government" and whether its appropriate for us to recognize and accept that government.

Jeff B.

I really dont think that this would ever work here in the US but we may see laws that are pretty tough to get past getting anymore guns .....where i think they will get us is taking away ammo or really limiting the amount you can have but the fact of the matter is i wont give up either and i know there are millions of people that feel the same .

I was chilled by the "Welcome to Alexandra" sign behind the reporter. "Welcome to town. You can't protect yourself well while you're here. But we, and the thugs, are glad you came."

This is a very touchy topic to discuss... It's easy to fall into the trap of making pronouncements and some extreme statements in the heat of the emotion that the topic stirs up.

If Trump is elected, I don't think much changes either way. We probably get SC Justices that are more in line with our thought process. If HRC gets elected, I believe that she'll begin a campaign against our rights immediately through the use of EO's and selective enforcement. Then, she'll likely get to pick several SC Justices, which will tilt the court against individual rights and firearms in general. If the Democrats were to retake the Senate and ultimately the House, with a hostile Executive and Supreme Court, the cause of individual rights and the literal interpretation of the Constitution would be in a serious condition.

That's just a high level discussion about the environment we'd face. Getting into the nitty gritty that would arise with, for example, Chuck Schumer as the Majority Leader in the Senate and a possible return of Pelosi as Speaker, gives me the willies.

Jeff B.

Shamelessly stolen and Facebooked.

Kenneth77 wrote:I really dont think that this would ever work here in the US but we may see laws that are pretty tough to get past getting anymore guns .....where i think they will get us is taking away ammo or really limiting the amount you can have but the fact of the matter is i wont give up either and i know there are millions of people that feel the same .

Jeff B. wrote:This is a very touchy topic to discuss... It's easy to fall into the trap of making pronouncements and some extreme statements in the heat of the emotion that the topic stirs up.

If Trump is elected, I don't think much changes either way. We probably get SC Justices that are more in line with our thought process. If HRC gets elected, I believe that she'll begin a campaign against our rights immediately through the use of EO's and selective enforcement. Then, she'll likely get to pick several SC Justices, which will tilt the court against individual rights and firearms in general. If the Democrats were to retake the Senate and ultimately the House, with a hostile Executive and Supreme Court, the cause of individual rights and the literal interpretation of the Constitution would be in a serious condition.

That's just a high level discussion about the environment we'd face. Getting into the nitty gritty that would arise with, for example, Chuck Schumer as the Majority Leader in the Senate and a possible return of Pelosi as Speaker, gives me the willies.

Jeff B.

110% agree with this and hope that it doesn't come to be reality that the witch gets in but if she does i really do think there will be some kind of civil war or civil melt down in some towns , i hate to think about it but in this day and time it is all to much a very likely possibility.

The Annoyed Man wrote:Shamelessly stolen and Facebooked.

ditto...

I could not help stealing uh borrowing it myself.