Page 1 of 1
Moly coated bullets
Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2007 9:06 pm
by OatWillie
Did a quick search and did not find much about this bullet coating.
I would like to get you experience guys' opinions on using moly coated bullets. what are the pro's and con's? I've heard that once you start using them, you should not switch back to non-coated (that does not make sense to me). Other myths and facts??
thanks, Ken
Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2007 9:21 pm
by HighVelocity
welcome to the forum!
I have some experience with these bullets. My wife and I both shoot Cowboy Action and use a 125gr moly coated bullet in our pistols and rifles. They have worked great and are much cleaner than plain cast lead.
Recently I shot some 230gr moly coated bullets in 45acp and they worked great in my 1911 but caused some problems in my 45acp revolver by gunking up the cylinder just enough to interfere with the loading after about 5-6 cylinders full.
That's my experience with moly coated bullets so far, limited as it is..
Posted: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:58 am
by Smokewagon
I have used these in .45 colt. The moly seems to hinder the lube sticking in the bullet lube grooves. Also seems to be dirtier, maybe caused by the loose lube. Used the 1000 I ordered and haven't bought any more.

Posted: Sat Jul 14, 2007 11:57 pm
by OatWillie
thanks for the info...
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 9:26 am
by TxD
Smokewagon wrote:I have used these in .45 colt. The moly seems to hinder the lube sticking in the bullet lube grooves. Also seems to be dirtier, maybe caused by the loose lube. Used the 1000 I ordered and haven't bought any more.

I may not understand your post, but I don't think you should use any additional lube on the molt coated bullets such as "Precision".
I think the moly coating is the lube.
I may be wrong so call Precision and check it out.
Hope this helps.
Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 11:09 am
by HighVelocity
I found out something interesting about moly coated bullets yesterday while doing some chronographing.
45acp 230gr plated bullet sized .451 on 3.9gr of Clays, avg 735 fps
Same load and pistol but with a moly coated 230gr bullet sized at .452 avg 760fps.
That's a pretty big difference when you're trying to get as close as possible to 718 fps without going under.
I'm thinking that the powder charge could be dropped a tenth of a grain or two and still get the velocity that I want. I haven't tried it yet though.
Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 2:00 pm
by jhutto
45acp 230gr plated bullet sized .451 on 3.9gr of Clays, avg 735 fps
Same load and pistol but with a moly coated 230gr bullet sized at .452 avg 760fps.
I thought 45ACP used .451 bullets, not .452. Are these in fact interchangable? Are you not building exsessive pressure?
Thanks
Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 2:30 pm
by Houston1944
Most 45acp lead bullets are .452 and FMJ are .451. I've seen plated bullets in both sizes. 1 or 2 thousands does not make that much difference. I shoot both .355 and .357 bullets in my 38 Super.
Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2007 4:33 pm
by jrosto
HighVelocity wrote:I
45acp 230gr plated bullet sized .451 on 3.9gr of Clays, avg 735 fps
Same load and pistol but with a moly coated 230gr bullet sized at .452 avg 760fps.
Were you using the Precision coated bullets? If so, what OAL did you seat your bullets at? I am thinking 1.260" as the flat of the RNF Precision bullets is approximately .01"
Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2007 6:35 pm
by mrbug
jrosto wrote:HighVelocity wrote:I
45acp 230gr plated bullet sized .451 on 3.9gr of Clays, avg 735 fps
Same load and pistol but with a moly coated 230gr bullet sized at .452 avg 760fps.
Were you using the Precision coated bullets? If so, what OAL did you seat your bullets at? I am thinking 1.260" as the flat of the RNF Precision bullets is approximately .01"
I had a problem with my chambering when I sized mine to 1.250. I had to reduce them to 1.230. That is with the Precision 230 rnf's.
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2007 10:05 am
by jrosto
mrbug wrote: I had a problem with my chambering when I sized mine to 1.250. I had to reduce them to 1.230. That is with the Precision 230 rnf's.
Thanks mrbug, I did not think I would have to go that short. Looks like some experimenting is in order
