TexasCHLforum.com

I know when I talk to my friends who are attorneys we are all struggling with what happened to the emails and aren't satisfied with answers to date. While we all know of the occasional use of personal email addresses for business, none of my friends circle can understand how it was viewed as ok/secure/appropriate to use a private server for secure documents AND why further Hillary took it upon herself to review them and delete documents without providing anyone outside her circle a chance to weigh in. It smacks of acting above the law and it smacks of the type of thing I've either gotten discovery sanctions for, fired people for, etc.

The Department of State provided a detailed readout of official email traffic it was about to release in response to Freedom of Information Act requests to Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.

The emails concerned speeches former President Bill Clinton gave abroad, and did not include any traffic from Hillary Clinton, according to new emails released by WikiLeaks.

“All — DOS is soon releasing another round of documents and email traffic (not hers) in response to Judicial Watch’s FOIA request on DOS’s process for reviewing WJC’s speaking engagements,” Heather Samuelson wrote March 17, 2015. Samuelson has been a Clinton aide since the early 2000s and served as White House liaison during Hillary Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state. Maura Pally and Craig Minassian of the Clinton Foundation; Philippe Reines, a longtime Clinton adviser; press secretary Nick Merrill; communications director Jennifer Palmieri; Cheryl Mills, Clinton’s chief of staff at State; and Tina Flournoy, President Clinton’s former chief of staff, are included on the email.

“It’s 116 pages with approx. 50 sponsor/subsponsor requests,” the email continues. “No objections by DOS in this batch, but some lengthy internal discussions among DOS officials that I highlighted below.”



Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/11/wikil ... z4Mmom7ojI

She also laid out a strategy for how the campaign should deal with Donald Trump—arguing they should avoid a one-on-one fight with him over gun control at that point. “My theory is that we do not want to be in a one on one with Trump – but want to hit him occasionally,” she said. “In which case, we also need to be hitting Sanders occasionally so we can credibly say we are not only focused on the general.”

Palmieri went on to say that the difference between Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders on gun control, an issue where Hillary ran to the left of Sanders, tested well. She added that the campaign had already planned to use the issue in an upcoming press call.

TexasJohnBoy wrote:
ETA: I removed a conspiracy theory image from this post. I can validate half of it, but not that Wasserman Schultz was a co-chair on Clinton's 2012 campaign.

ETA(again): Here we go. Could be a total coincidence...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debbie_Wa ... hultz#2008
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Kaine ... .932011.29

> Circling back to this. John, you said you might have ideas on how to edit > the server sentence? Brian just floated whether we should say "I messed up" > instead of "this was a screw-up." What do folks think about that? Other > edits we should make? And then what are next steps here? > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 1:40 AM, Dan Schwerin <dschwerin@hillaryclinton.com > > wrote: > >> Made some edits here after chatting with Brian. He thought the "screw >> up" sound bite needed to be less hedged, so I moved the line about >> convenience and previous secretaries elsewhere. He also thought the server >> news should be down with the classified section and given a little set-up. >> Not sure if what i have here does the trick, but check it out. >> Dan >> >> On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 12:50 AM, Dan Schwerin < >> dschwerin@hillaryclinton.com> wrote: >> >>> Here's a draft of a statement that I've worked on with Jake and Jen. See >>> what you think. Have tried to express contrition while not losing >>> perspective.

QATAR - Would like to see WJC "for five minutes" in NYC, to present $1 million check that Qatar promised for WJC's birthday in 2011.

mojo84 wrote:Your typical birthday present from a foreign nation.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/8396

QATAR - Would like to see WJC "for five minutes" in NYC, to present $1 million check that Qatar promised for WJC's birthday in 2011.