Page 1 of 1

GA: Teen intruders use stun gun on woman

Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2017 2:35 pm
by philip964
https://www.google.com/amp/www.ajc.com/ ... N/amp.html

Not mentioned in the horrifying news article is that an ICE detainer has been placed on the two men.

Hopefully that will occur in 30 years. I remember a time when the death penalty was given out for rape.

Re: GA: Teen intruders use stun gun on woman

Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:36 pm
by johncanfield
How very sad, I can't imagine that amount of evil.

Re: GA: Teen intruders use stun gun on woman

Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:41 pm
by C-dub
Might be nice if the death penalty could be carried out more often by the intended victim just before the rape actually occurred.

Re: GA: Teen intruders use stun gun on woman

Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2017 9:20 pm
by rp_photo
C-dub wrote:Might be nice if the death penalty could be carried out more often by the intended victim just before the rape actually occurred.
Legal stopping of the threat by an armed victim is by far the most satisfying punishment.

Re: GA: Teen intruders use stun gun on woman

Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2017 10:32 pm
by Liberty
rp_photo wrote:
C-dub wrote:Might be nice if the death penalty could be carried out more often by the intended victim just before the rape actually occurred.
Legal stopping of the threat by an armed victim is by far the most satisfying punishment.
I don't believe that many folks involved with a legitimat self defense shooting would use the word satisfying to describe their feelings after the shoot.

Re: GA: Teen intruders use stun gun on woman

Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2017 10:37 pm
by bblhd672
C-dub wrote:Might be nice if the death penalty could be carried out more often by the intended victim just before the rape actually occurred.
Or the victim's family after

Re: GA: Teen intruders use stun gun on woman

Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2017 10:52 pm
by rssecurity
I don't believe that many folks involved with a legitimat self defense shooting would use the word satisfying to describe their feelings after the shoot.
Of course not, for two reasons:

1) One, the crime was pretty much prevented. They didn't go through the horror, and don't have as many physical and [hopefully] psychological scars.
2) [Hopefully] they've invoked their 5A rights and their lawyer is doing all the talking.