Page 1 of 1
Carry Permits Jump Over 1400 Percent When DC Went ‘Shall Issue’
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2018 1:30 pm
by Paladin
article
Prior the court ruling, according to The Washington Post, only 123 people had active D.C. concealed carry permits and MPD previously denied 77 percent of applicants for not providing the once-mandated “good reason” to carry.
Next up, reciprocity?
Re: Carry Permits Jump Over 1400 Percent When DC Went ‘Shall Issue’
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2018 1:40 pm
by Soccerdad1995
Paladin wrote: Wed Nov 14, 2018 1:30 pm
article
Prior the court ruling, according to The Washington Post, only 123 people had active D.C. concealed carry permits and MPD previously denied 77 percent of applicants for not providing the once-mandated “good reason” to carry.
Next up, reciprocity?
I'll settle for a non-resident permit
Re: Carry Permits Jump Over 1400 Percent When DC Went ‘Shall Issue’
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2018 10:25 pm
by chasfm11
Somehow, we need the same thing to happen in NJ and MD. Both are as bad as D.C.
Re: Carry Permits Jump Over 1400 Percent When DC Went ‘Shall Issue’
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2018 10:35 am
by crazy2medic
We need a Supreme Court ruling that strikes down all the restrictions on carrying, the reason the D.C. ruling wasn't challenged was they were afraid of that very ruling!
Re: Carry Permits Jump Over 1400 Percent When DC Went ‘Shall Issue’
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2018 10:43 am
by Gator Guy
Soccerdad1995 wrote: Wed Nov 14, 2018 1:40 pm
Paladin wrote: Wed Nov 14, 2018 1:30 pm
article
Prior the court ruling, according to The Washington Post, only 123 people had active D.C. concealed carry permits and MPD previously denied 77 percent of applicants for not providing the once-mandated “good reason” to carry.
Next up, reciprocity?
I'll settle for a non-resident permit
You can get one already.