TexasCHLforum.com

Posted: **Fri Apr 24, 2020 9:57 am**

https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watc ... e-ammo?amp

U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez called the law "onerous and convoluted" and "constitutionally defective."

"The experiment has been tried. The casualties have been counted. California's new ammunition background check law misfires and the Second Amendment rights of California citizens have been gravely injured," Benitez, a Bush appointee, wrote in the ruling.

Posted: **Fri Apr 24, 2020 11:44 am**

Already mentioned in the "No Place but California" thread here:

https://texaschlforum.com/viewtopic.php ... 0#p1282597

Posted: **Sat Apr 25, 2020 11:04 pm**

Well that didn't last long:

https://www.nraila.org/articles/2020042 ... strictions

Unfortunately There are no more 9th appeals court vacancies for Trump to fill right now. There are 26 DistrictCourt vacancies. Leave no vacancy behind!

Posted: **Sun Apr 26, 2020 7:44 am**

How come liberal causes get to the courts in a measure of hours, not months while conservatives are held up at the bench?

That is the real miscarriage of justice in our country.

TexasCHLforum.com

CA: Fed judge rules Background checks for Ammo unconstitutional

CA: Fed judge rules Background checks for Ammo unconstitutional

Re: CA: Fed judge rules Background checks for Ammo unconstitutional

Re: CA: Fed judge rules Background checks for Ammo unconstitutional

Re: CA: Fed judge rules Background checks for Ammo unconstitutional