The only problem is that they never proved the glove didn't fit.kw5kw wrote: Remember: "You can't convict if the glove don't fit."
Same reasoning: "You can't convict if the sign isn't compliant."
Makes for some thought doesn't it?
Russ
I called DPS, the AG's office, and everyone I could think of a couple of years ago, trying to determine if there was any way to "ensure" compliance in posting. The eventual response that I got, from a young lady in the CHL department, was that they considered any sign a reasonable effort and therefore expected compliance. She got miffed at me when I suggested that the same logic might apply to speed limits. She suggested that I might volunteer to be a test case. Made me glad i didn't give my real name.
Even though LEOs here and elsewhere have said that they would not enforce a non-compliant sign but would suggest that a CHL leave and consider not returning when carrying, they may not be the officer that confronts you and you may spend some time and money straightening out the confusion.