"The battle between those who support an inalienable right and those that support the gun-control agenda."
Obviously, a clearly defined difference of opinion...
One opinion based upon the precidence that an inalienable right is an absolute and a founding or unwaivering core interpretation...
And the other based upon the idea that the United States Constitution is a living document that lends its interpretation of that document to apply to the direct issues facing us today, and not 200 some odd years ago...
So, in the interest of not getting bogged down in a bill that has been filed that "may" end up abridging (permanently) our original "inalienable right" to keep and bear arms...
What do you believe would be some of the options we have or battle we can wage if this bill were to become "law"?
I have a small book that I received as a Christmas present from my Dad a few years ago, its called the 2nd Amendment Primer...I have looked through it from cover to cover...And one of the things I plan to do is note where the word "inalienable" comes into play in regards to this issue...
History being a great lesson to be learned and reviewed as often as one can stomach, but I feel this is a hinge point where the near future will be determined by people who may, or may not be as politically or philisophically aligned with some of us as we are in regards to this particular issue/battle...
I believe history is on our side, but those who do not apply that knowledge as well as they should, appear to be trending against it...
In the end I feel we may prevail, but its almost too close to call...
...