It only trumps other parts of the law if you think you can get a piece of 200+ year old paper to jump out of its glass case and "protect" you from all of the men (and women) with guns who will come after you if you think your interpretation of the Constitution is superior to what the courts have currently established through case law, and you act on those thoughts.stevie_d_64 wrote: BTW, I have something that trumps a Federally protected right...
Its called a Constitutionally protected right...That Federal stuff is just gravy as far as I am concerned...
But to some I am wrong and annoying...Thats ok, I get over it quickly...
Now, if you (and/or your lawyers) can convince those same courts that your interpretation is correct, then all those people with guns I was referring to will be protecting your rights (as you have now established them) instead of coming after you.