You are thinking like a reasonable man, not Corporate Security. If he did this, he just identified himself as a man who carries a gun, which is to say, a threat or a potential threat, from their (and their insurer's) perspective. If they didn't just let him go immediately, if only on another pretext, I am sure the corporate "we can search your car" policy would be quickly and regularly enforced.joe817 wrote:...
What about going in and talking to Corporate Security and telling them ...
Just my opinion.
I am afraid that single person efforts to change a corporate policies like this (including non-compliant gun-buster signs) just result in either identifying oneself as a "problem" or chinks in the policy that can be quickly "remedied." Occasionally someone finds a reasonable person in the management who can actually change the policy, but I fear those are few and far between.