Search found 2 matches

by thatguyoverthere
Tue Jul 11, 2017 9:00 pm
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: Church Security after Sep 1
Replies: 5
Views: 2959

Re: Church Security after Sep 1

Thanks for the replies, guys. Sorry I haven't responded sooner, but I don't get to log on very often.
crazy2medic wrote:In my OPINION, I would think if the Church allows you to go about armed then you should be OK carrying in whatever manner the church is comfortable with, second I believe that you should provide armed security for the church so long as it is intended to prevent a massacre or for your personal safety. If however you should encounter somebody that is being less than cordial and getting heated around the collar local law enforcement should be called at the first sign things are gonna get ugly!
My opinion, IANAL but that is my view!
crazy2medic, yes, we have the ok with our small church. We are not posted 30.06 or 30.07 and the pastor knows about (and is ok with) several of us routinely carrying during services, and that we are planning on continuing to do so once we take up our volunteer security duties after Sep 1. So we're good there with the church leaders. And you are exactly right. The firearm would come out ONLY in defense of self or others only if confronted with an imminent threat of deadly force or serious bodily injury. Anything less that those type situations, and no one will know that I (we) are armed.
rtschl wrote:...The whole point of the legislation was to exempt churches from the occupation code that required licensed security. If the legislature wanted to "disarm" volunteers organizing to protect their church they would have left the law as it was.
... No mention regarding firearms whatsoever.
Thanks rtschl. Yes, I'm familiar with the Occupational Code amendment, and it is very simple and straightforward (surprisingly!).

What I'm trying to verify is that there is no prohibition in the other CHL-relevent laws (chapter 411, PC chapter 9, etc.) against carrying while acting as volunteer security, whether in a church or as part of a neighborhood watch or any other similar situation where I am providing volunteer security on behalf of someone other than just myself. I have not been able to find any such prohibition, but I have friends who seem to think that there is one ("in there somewhere").

Thanks again.
by thatguyoverthere
Mon Jul 10, 2017 2:13 pm
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: Church Security after Sep 1
Replies: 5
Views: 2959

Church Security after Sep 1

So we got the change that we wanted in the last legislative session exempting churches from the requirement to have certified LEO or security officers provide church security, thus allowing churches to use un-certified volunteer personnel as church security, effective September 1, 2017. That's a good thing in my book.

Now a dumb question: are LTC'ers prohibited from carrying and/or using their firearms while acting as volunteer church security?

I have not been able to find anything in the law that says they are prohibited from doing so, so I think LTC'ers would not be prohibited from carrying while on that volunteer security duty. But I ask the question because I have spoken to some other LTC'ers who believe they ARE prohibited from having/using their firearm in that capacity (but have been unable to cite the specific chapter and sub-paragraph that says that).

On a side note, I do find it interesting, however, that the particular pre-paid legal service that I subscribe to which covers defensive firearm use specifically states that they do NOT provide services to a plan participant who ends up actually using a firearm for defense in this particular capacity of volunteer security. But of course, having no "insurance coverage" for an act is totally different from that act being legal or not.

So how about it. Am I totally missing something here?

Not asking for legal opinions or counsel, just asking for personal opinions from private citizens. Thanks! :txflag:

Return to “Church Security after Sep 1”