Yeah...I don't buy that. Besides the reasons Jim gave, they couldn't ever get a credible expert witness to testify that in a deadly force situation you should or could have attempted to "wing" the baddie instead of taking a CoM shot. Evidence of incompetence would only hurt you, not help you. (Not that a couple of points down from 250 would be exactly evidence of incompetence, mind.)LedJedi wrote:
you know, our instructor said something interesting during class. I'm sure those with more experience can chime in on this, but he said something to the effect of "you dont want a perfect score on this. If you ever shoot someone and get pulled into court and it shows surgical skill it's going to come up that you could have shot without killing them."
That perked my ears up and is perhaps a good point. Whether that would actually happen or not, i dont know. I threw two shots outside my 10 ring because of that though. Couldn't hurt.
-Xander