mloamiller wrote:We'll have to disagree on that. The law is very clear on what a business owner is required to do. If they haven't put enough effort into finding out what that requirement is and then implementing it correctly, that's on them.pushpullpete wrote: however, you broke the 'spirit' of the law when you saw & disregarded the 'illegal' sign and that kind of action can shine an unfavorable light on the whole 'responsible gun owner' thing that most of us are trying to put forward.
I am being responsible in that I have put in the effort to know what the law states.
Yes, we will have to. That was why I called it the 'SPIRIT' of the law & not the law itself.
I am NOT calling you or anyone else on this forum stupid, on the contrary I believe there are some very smart people here. I've spent too
many years banging my head up against stupid people that refuse to listen to people who are more knowledgeable than they are.
It took me a few (maybe quite a few) decades but I have finally learned what my father meant when he used to tell me to work smarter, not
just harder. Grab them by the throat and push their face in it (like I've done most of my life), yes it will get your point across but, the end
result (after they call the police) will NOT be what you want or expect.
There is a lot of money on both sides of this argument & finesse is needed for our side much more than a heavy hand.