My numbers come from the user's guide which is hundreds of pages, and an independent audit of the SAO. That may help you track them down. I'm not sure what I did with them.
What I SHOULD do is often debated :)
Search found 4 matches
Return to “Carrollton Police Stop”
- Fri Nov 09, 2012 4:08 pm
- Forum: LEO Contacts & Bloopers
- Topic: Carrollton Police Stop
- Replies: 26
- Views: 4677
- Fri Nov 09, 2012 12:10 pm
- Forum: LEO Contacts & Bloopers
- Topic: Carrollton Police Stop
- Replies: 26
- Views: 4677
Re: Carrollton Police Stop
Their intent has little bearing on what courts have decided is a GTG detention. The judge I dealt with explicitly stated that rarely to LEOs have the luxury of operating with 100% of the information surrounding a situation. However, as testified by me, he beilieved that it clearly was enough to stop and investigate further.
There are conflicting cases in the court of appeals in TX regarding the issue, however the difference came to the officer's ability to understand the returns given by the database and deduct reasonable conclusions on that information.
There are conflicting cases in the court of appeals in TX regarding the issue, however the difference came to the officer's ability to understand the returns given by the database and deduct reasonable conclusions on that information.
- Fri Nov 09, 2012 6:38 am
- Forum: LEO Contacts & Bloopers
- Topic: Carrollton Police Stop
- Replies: 26
- Views: 4677
Re: Carrollton Police Stop
Having been to a suppression hearing on a stop I made for no insurance, I feel qualified to comment on this. The insurance database is over 99% accurate. By law it only has to be 95%. Either way, it definitely gets an operator past the 51% often associated with reasonable suspicion.
- Thu Nov 08, 2012 4:20 pm
- Forum: LEO Contacts & Bloopers
- Topic: Carrollton Police Stop
- Replies: 26
- Views: 4677
Re: Carrollton Police Stop
Odds are your policy covers a number if cars, and not specific vehicles.