data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fafb0/fafb0b3369e6bb89675ca93362ceef0b02eb5bd7" alt="I Agree :iagree:"
I generally agree with Hoppes here.
I understand the concept of letting the terrorists win by being paranoid and overly cautious and giving up our freedoms in the interest of security. Trust me, i completely understand that. Unregulated spying on civilians falls into that category for me. Not suspicious bags in public places. That's exactly what went BOOM over across the pond.
I'm sure the family members of those affected by that tragedy wish someone had stepped up and asked a security guard to check that person's backpack. If he had been ok then there would have never been a problem.
I think it's foolish to ignore activity that is "reasonably out of place or suspicious." The fact of the matter is it's not paranoia if there really ARE people out to get you, and there ARE. I also understand that "reasonable suspicion" can be abused to no end by law enforcement.
Curious and reasonable caution are A OK in my book and having a security guard politely ask that person what's in the bag after I've already left the area is very reasonable to me.
To some that might be considered overkill or paranoia or the terrorists winning, but i'm paranoid and alive in that situation and not sitting in the theater sweating that guy that has me freaked out.
I understand folks disagree with me, but that's what makes this country great. You can do that and not get shot! (usually)