The original story did not specifically state that they were photos taken immediately after the accident. Since they did not state when they were taken, I was led to believe that these photos were of the actual "accidential discharge."Pawpaw wrote:I believe this incident really did happen, but the pictures were staged a day or two later for illustrative purposes.
For their own credibility, if the photos not taken immediately after the discharge, the OP should have stated that they were "staged" or "recreated" after the fact.