Yeah I'm sorry, I forgot the institutions I was referencing. I'm sure it is all caused by climate change.anygunanywhere wrote:Silly you. Universities are not for education. They are for indoctrination.Jusme wrote:OlBill wrote:http://news.stanford.edu/2014/11/14/don ... dy-111414/Pawpaw wrote:That was published in November, 2014. Does that make it a pre-buttal?
Same guy tried the same thing then.
Yeah take out drug epidemics, as a contributing factor, which accounts for 85% of almost all crime, and you can make up anything you want. Are there no true scientific studies coming out of Commifornia universities?
Search found 5 matches
Return to “CA: Standford study debunks NRA's more guns less crime”
- Sat Jul 01, 2017 6:26 pm
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: CA: Standford study debunks NRA's more guns less crime
- Replies: 19
- Views: 4696
Re: CA: Standford study debunks NRA's more guns less crime
- Sat Jul 01, 2017 5:04 pm
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: CA: Standford study debunks NRA's more guns less crime
- Replies: 19
- Views: 4696
Re: CA: Standford study debunks NRA's more guns less crime
OlBill wrote:http://news.stanford.edu/2014/11/14/don ... dy-111414/Pawpaw wrote:That was published in November, 2014. Does that make it a pre-buttal?
Same guy tried the same thing then.
Yeah take out drug epidemics, as a contributing factor, which accounts for 85% of almost all crime, and you can make up anything you want. Are there no true scientific studies coming out of Commifornia universities?
- Sat Jul 01, 2017 4:07 pm
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: CA: Standford study debunks NRA's more guns less crime
- Replies: 19
- Views: 4696
Re: CA: Standford study debunks NRA's more guns less crime
Pawpaw wrote:That was published in November, 2014. Does that make it a pre-buttal?
I think it's a pre-re-un-de-debunking, but I may have missed one.
- Fri Jun 30, 2017 2:51 pm
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: CA: Standford study debunks NRA's more guns less crime
- Replies: 19
- Views: 4696
Re: CA: Standford study debunks NRA's more guns less crime
Lynyrd wrote:This paragraph from the article above was excellent.Superman wrote:Thankfully, they are fighting an uphill battle:
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/06/ ... eedom.html
The point that strikes home is the difference between wanting to force others to be like you, and allowing others to choose on their own. For me, this crystallizes the progressive vs. the conservative philosophy.Another point worth noting is that while most gun owners could never see themselves not owning a gun, they have no desire to force others to possess them. Conversely, many Americans who do not own firearms have an almost compulsive desire to disarm law-abiding gun owners even as proof mounts against the efficacy of confiscation and disarmament. When guns are regulated away from those who seek them lawfully, only the criminals are armed.
Exactly. I own guns, if you choose not to own guns, fine, I don't care. I don't own monster trucks, but if you want to own one, or more, that's also fine with me, I will never try to take away your monster truck(s).
- Fri Jun 30, 2017 11:25 am
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: CA: Standford study debunks NRA's more guns less crime
- Replies: 19
- Views: 4696
Re: CA: Standford study debunks NRA's more guns less crime
Makes you wonder if anyone even reads Newsweek anymore, there are no comments at all on the hogwash. I just love it when they use "statistical models" to reach conclusions, and then decide things only if they get the same result more than once. They did, not include "murder" statistics, in their "study" which is the standard for all studies showing a reduction. If they input that data, their whole model falls apart, as being able to further an agenda. Murder rates, have been steadily decreasing, with each new state, that passes, any form of carry. But if you take that out of the equation, you can get the "study" to say what you want.
This is not worth the paper it's printed on.
This is not worth the paper it's printed on.