I respect you opinion.Charles L. Cotton wrote:No, entering and leaving a building is not a "sponsored" activity. I have been critical of Rosenthal's interpretation of the now-repealed presumption of traveling, but I have no reason to believe he would try to prosecute anyone under these conditions. To be perfectly honest, I don't think anyone in the Harris County DA's office actually said they would accept charges under these circumstances. I suspect that was just inaccurate locker-room banter. I'm not saying the Deputy is lying and that he never heard that statement made; I just think he heard inaccurate information, or information based upon a different fact pattern.frankie_the_yankee wrote:But do you (Chas) think there is any way a DA could read the law such that children entering or leaving the school could be classified as "an activity sponsored by a school or educational institution"?
Chas.
This LEO was very clear in what he thought was the law and also what he thought about this topic.
After this conversation and others that we had. I did not feel as though the CHL holder is looked upon in a positive light by the HCSD.