My argument is that 46.035 trumps itself. It states:G26ster wrote:That's the point. A non CHL doesn't have to put the holster or the Glock box in a bag as he/she is exempted under 46.02. The CHL apparently does (or might have to) according to Keith B. (for the holster) to keep from being nabbed for Failure to Conceal under 46.035. If so, why should a CHL have to jump through hoops a non CHL doesn't if the weapon is not his/her carry weapon, but one he/she just bought, had repaired, or fired at Bass Pro range, etc.?LarryH wrote:How about putting the gun box in a store bag and carry it out that way?
A Bass Pro Shop (or Academy or Gander Mountain or . . .) bag could contain darn near anything.
I'm NOT opposed to having to follow strict laws as a CHL, nor am looking for special treatment. I just want to be sure that I have the same rights as everyone else. I do not want to lose these rights just because I have a CHL. If 46.02 trumps 46.035, that's fine, but I don't think we have a legal opinion on that (yet).
Now all of this is hypothetical, and my recent posts have been strictly related to Keith B.'s answer to the picture of the holster in this thread.
If a non-CHL can carry to their car, then a CHL doing the same thing is NOT "carrying under the authority" of their CHL. So they don't have the 46.035 duty to conceal.PC §46.035. UNLAWFUL CARRYING OF HANDGUN BY LICENSE HOLDER, (a) A license holder commits an offense if the license holder carries a handgun on or about the license holder's person under the authority of Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code, and intentionally fails to conceal the handgun.
For example, if you are open carrying in your own house and you have a CHL, are you violating 46.035? I argue that you are not. Same if you're (handgun) hunting. Or carrying a gun at the range.