TexasCHLforum.com

Pinkycatcher wrote:

BigDan wrote:Only thing I do agree on is that it is very easy for criminals to purchase ammunition. Everything else - keeping records of ammo sales, prohibiting internet sale, etc is just dumb. Good ol' Kalifornia for you though.

How do you suggest changing it? If criminals can easily get bullets (legally, or if they make it illegal, illegally) then everyone should be able to defend themselves if said criminals bullets walk over and try to hurt them.

Same old argument, a bit tired, but nonethess I've never seen the antis validly refute it, only attack it as such. A key component of a firearm is its ammunition; thus, a restriction on ammo is a restriction on arms, and there must be compelling government interest as well as proof that the law is both effective and the least restrictive way to accomplish the desired goal. Gun control is neither, regardless of the validity of any compelling interest.