+1 on all of the above. Try both - buy the one that feels best.My preference is for the Ruger wheelguns for anything starting with .4x. The main reason for this is that the Ruger revolvers do not beat my hand into hamburger with full-power loads, whereas the S&W grip shape is just "wrong" for my hand, and full-power loads will feel like they're trying to tear my thumb out by the roots. I can shoot a Redhawk all day long with no problems, but a S&W 29 will wear me out after only a cylinder or two.
Second reason, the Rugers generally tend to be a bit cheaper, especially the single-action Blackhawks, when compared to the double-action S&Ws.
Third, they're undoubtedly stronger. While injudicious handloading (or rather, deliberate massive overcharges) can destroy them just as any other gun, they are more tolerant of abuse and envelope-pushing.
On the flip side, if you're looking for more "target/defense" purposes for the gun, the S&W might suit you more. They generally have better triggers, and .44 Special is quite sufficient to both target and defensive tasks (not to mention a lot easier on the hand and the revolver), while still able to shoot the heavier ammo.
It all depends on your considerations:
Price
Durability
Trigger
Comfort
For me, the Ruger wins, in price, durability, and comfort. For you, I don't know. Either are good guns, though.
Search found 1 match
Return to “Ruger or S&W .44magnum revolvers”
- Mon Dec 19, 2011 9:37 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Ruger or S&W .44magnum revolvers
- Replies: 20
- Views: 2822