It seems you are trying to defend running over a rider. Justification? The rider did something stupid, though not necessarily against the law.anygunanywhere wrote:Yes it is.gemini wrote:Yea, right. But "using a motorcycle and rider as a speed bump"..... that's on you.anygunanywhere wrote:Thank you. I will have a nice day. My inept driving skills when a stupid stunt rider lays it down in front of me? Please stop.gemini wrote:...and if something should go wrong with your inept driving skills? Your level of remorse would be what?anygunanywhere wrote:The level of my remorse at using a motorcycle and rider as a speed bump is indirectly proportional to the stupidity of their actions while in front of me should something go wrong with their poorly chosen risky behavior.
Mrs. Anygun and I had this very discussion as we watched a stunt idjit on I-45 southbound on our way to Galveston one afternoon.
Anygunanywhere
None? Because you just ran over a man who will never go home to his kids, his wife, his family again.
Rider's fault or not. I don't see the humor in your post, or was it just bravado from someone who's never
seen a motorcycle fatality? Have a nice day.
I have seen motorcycle fatalities. I was a paramedic for 12 years.
To each his own. I take it you are a motorcycle fan. Good for you. In my world a person is responsible for their actions whether it be stupid behavior with a motorcycle or with a firearm. Just because someone is stupid to the point of dying does not warrant remorse on my part. Sorry, but life just does not work that way.
Anygunanywhere
One more thing. If someone has kids, a wife, and family he should care about them to the point where he does not do stupid stunts. Stupid stunts illustrate that he does not care about them. In the final analysis, why should I care if he does not?
Anygunanywhere
Nice.
I'm trying to get drivers to be aware of motorcycles. Look twice etc. Safety from both sides. We obviously have two different objectives.
In the final analysis, no one can make you care about anything.