While your waitress analogy is spot-on, I would argue against the same being true of the guards running the metal detector. These people are charged with the duty to grant or deny people the ability to enter the facility presumably based on the criteria set in place by the management/ownership of the facility. I would think they would have the authority to give verbal notice. IMHO, YMMV, etc.will381796 wrote:Metal detectors are kind of useless without an attendant monitoring them. But the person giving you verbal notice needs to have the authority of the building owner to do so. Let's say that you go into a restaurant and, for whatever reason, your cashier sees your CCW and tells you to leave. They don't have the required authority to provide you with verbal notice. Now, if the manager comes and tells you, then you would need to leave as the manager has been given that authority by the owner. So, if some john q. public guy is monitoring the metal detectors and tells you that you can't enter with your gun, do they have the authority to provide you with verbal notice? Guards don't necessarily have the authority to provide verbal notice simply because of their job duties Just something to think about...psycho_bob42 wrote:Do metal detectors alone count for verbal notice? I wouldn't think so, unless there is someone standing there saying no firearms allowed.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Question about prohibiting carry”
- Fri Mar 20, 2009 9:48 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Question about prohibiting carry
- Replies: 15
- Views: 3067
Re: Question about prohibiting carry
- Tue Mar 17, 2009 3:24 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Question about prohibiting carry
- Replies: 15
- Views: 3067
Re: Question about prohibiting carry
Since the seminar was run by a branch of the military, then they presumed that the facility was leased for the purposes of the seminar by the Federal Government (and it may have been, whether or not any money ever changed hands), therefore the Federal codes on weapons would apply as the premises for the duration of the "lease" would be under Fed control and Fed employees were present.