data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f5a2/5f5a2f5e94c8bd0743bed6744d9aeefa0b06a5ea" alt="evil :evil2:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ebac/8ebac32203659b1a718026fb2a585de03de342dd" alt="Jester :biggrinjester:"
Return to “Best BBQ Joints in TX”
Ya gotta get out of the big city and find the good country BBQ spotsHoosier Daddy wrote:subscribe
I hear about legen-waitforit-dary Texas BBQ but so far in Houston it's been OK but not great.
Keith B wrote:They are gas-fired and have a wood box. The big advantage is you can control the temperature with the gas better. And, you cook on indirect heat, not over the coals, so the heat and smoke hit the meat together. That gives you that red smoke ring!!
Lambda Force wrote:I think that's true for most places that pour on the sauce. They're hiding something.A-R wrote:On a side note, I think the method of cooking is the biggest problem many Texans have with "other" BBQ styles around the country. A lot of pork, especially heavily sauced, is just hiding the dirty little secret that it's cooked with electricity or gas and not wood.
A little sauce (not flavored corn syrup) is nice on the side but real BBQ tastes good without sauce.
I think you're right on. I remember Luther's (grew up in Houston) and it was terrible. Exactly the non-BBQ I was describing. This is why I actually like Rudy's, it's REAL BBQ cooked on wood-fired smoke in a stone pit.puma guy wrote: I don't know if I'm right or not but I believe the big chains have humidity controlled smokers to reduce shrinkage and increase profits. My ex broter in law's family had a BBQ place for forty years in Houston on Park Place and were put out of when Luther's opened on the Gulf Freeway. We ate at Luther's together once and I mentioned the meat just didn't quite taste BBQy for lack of a better word. He said it was because the pits were contolled for shrinkage. The meat was sort of like what you get from the smokers that have a water/liquid bowl in them like RediSmoke and Brinkman.
The original Salt Lick is famous for its all-you-can eat meat platters (need to split with at least 4-6 people to make it worth your while from a bang-for-the-buck perspective) also it was (still is?) a BYOB establishment that attracted UT and SWT students for decades. But I agree the BBQ is good but not great. A lot better than Bill Miller's though (I always hated that greasy place when I lived in SA).pbwalker wrote:I don't get the fascination with the Salt Lick. I've gone twice and, to me, it just tastes like standard BBQ. A touch better than Bill Millers. Is there a particular cut I should I try? Maybe I'm missing something...
Really need to try them. Heard great things.SigM4 wrote: City Market in Luling.