I agree with the idea of expanding MPA. Those bills would allow someone to carry in their bass boat or on a PWC, so it's not a big stretch to include an ATV...or a snowmobile for the people in North Texas.bcdudley wrote:I think that the motorist protection act should cover atv riders on Texas trails the same as the Guillen and Flynn house bills propose that boaters should be able to carry a sidearm while on Texas waterways.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Motorist protection act and atv's”
- Tue Mar 01, 2011 6:18 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Motorist protection act and atv's
- Replies: 37
- Views: 6994
Re: Motorist protection act and atv's
- Fri Feb 18, 2011 6:49 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Motorist protection act and atv's
- Replies: 37
- Views: 6994
Re: Motorist protection act and atv's
srothstein wrote:Many of these definitions differ, but the one in 501.002 specifically includes an ATV designed to be used off road as a motor vehicle.
TTC 501.002
(14) "Motor vehicle" means:
(A) any motor driven or propelled vehicle required to be registered under the laws of this state;
(B) a trailer or semitrailer, other than manufactured housing, that has a gross vehicle weight that exceeds 4,000 pounds;
(C) a house trailer;
(D) an all-terrain vehicle or a recreational off-highway vehicle, as those terms are defined by Section 502.001, designed by the manufacturer for off-highway use that is not required to be registered under the laws of this state; or
(E) a motorcycle, motor-driven cycle, or moped that is not required to be registered under the laws of this state, other than a motorcycle, motor-driven cycle, or moped designed for and used exclusively on a golf course.
TTC 502.001
(1) "All-terrain vehicle" means a motor vehicle that is:
(13) "Motor vehicle" means a vehicle that is self-propelled.
(24) "Vehicle" means a device in or by which a person or property is or may be transported or drawn on a public highway, other than a device used exclusively on stationary rails or tracks.
After reading that, the only thing I'm sure of is I wouldn't want to have to try to convince a jury that MPA allows me to carry on an ATV (on land I don't own/control without a CHL) because my layman's interpretation of the law is more correct than the interpretation of the prosecutor, who has presumably graduated law school and passed the bar exam.