The only real value in a radar detector, is knowing when one is working in your area because it's used against someone else. If it's targeted against you, your detector does no good. (Yes, I understand about picking up a continuous radar signal before the unit is able to get a lock on you, but in traffic this is rarely the case.)92f-fan wrote:A perpetually ignored law. If it weren't ignored there would be no market for detectors.srothstein wrote:Under the law, an officer to using an electronic device to check a car's speed constitutes a search. To do this legally, the officer must have probable cause. The probable cause comes from an officer being able to testify that he saw a vehicle approaching at what appeared to be a speed in excess of the speed limit.92f-fan wrote:HUH ?chabouk wrote:I think you mis-spelled "I used the trigger because continuous mode is an unconstitutional search of the driver, and I only searched drivers with radar after establishing probable cause via my trained and accurate estimation of the driver's speed."gregthehand wrote:I use to just use what we called the trigger on the radar so I didn't have to leave it running just for that reason.
I'm sure that's what you meant. Right?![]()
So does that law not apply to speed cameras ?
I'm fairly confident it would be upheld against speed cameras too, if anyone ever appealed it to that level. Are speed cameras even used in Texas?