TexasCHLforum.com

TLynnHughes wrote: Darnit...does this mean I need to remove the claymore from my front yard? I wouldn't say I was hoarding ammo, but I do consider myself a prepper.

T.

I do too. But I prep for end of the world, not "Take of the Feds"

mmaness wrote:And don't forget - one of the original reasons for the inclusion of the 2nd amendment in the Constitution is if we, the people, lose control of our government ... we can force it to change. And with these latest 'antics' of Pelosi and Obama, it sure looks like the government is not paying attention to it's bosses.

I think i'll let it get to the Supreme Court before I start Hoarding Ammo and planting claymores

bdickens wrote:The VA is not socialized medicine because in order to be covered, you have to have done something to earn the coverage; you can't get it for having done nothing but suck up other people's oxygen.

Oh I see.
http://www.slate.com/id/2114554/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Have you read this book, you might like it
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starship_Troopers" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I say we Draft the poor, you know, make them earn it

boomerang wrote:

marksiwel wrote:They have less liqour laws than Texas

How many privately owned liquor stores are in Ontario?

There are none.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liquor_Con ... of_Ontario" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
But, there are people trying to get it privatized. Still easier to get a drink there though.

Now try and buy a bottle of wine after midnight (Mon-Fri) Or a bottle of Jack before Noon on Sunday in Texas
Or up untill I moved you had to drive a few towns over to grab beer or wine in Coppell, and had to drive to Dallas to get hard booze.

So when are they going to outlaw booze in Canada? Seems like we Banned booze before Canada.
There was a form of Prohibition in Canada, but there were lots of exemptions.

Commander wrote:Should ObamaCare be passed, the Federal Government will be in a position to control every aspect of our lives by simply proclaiming something a health risk. Since some of the Health Organizations already consider "gun violence" a health issue, it is not a stretch of the imagination that the Fed could proclaim that gun ownership is a health risk and either deny health coverage to gun owners or charge significantly high rates to gun owners.

Yeah just like in Socialist Canada where they still
Own Guns
Are loosening their gun laws
Still have over weight people
Have looser laws on Pot than the US
Their Beer is stronger
They have less liqour laws than Texas
Also people still smoke tobacco in canada!

Yeah the goverment is cracking down on them

Also they pay less for prescription meds and you can get condone over the counter.

Or lets look at the US where they have Socialist Medicine
Medicare
Medicade
VA Clinics
and a whole mess of Military Hospitals that treat Soldiers and their family's
Yet we are still able to eat Red Meat, drink, and own guns.

Also nevermind that we have a supreme court that is more than likely going to rule in a favor, again, that owning a gun is a protected right.
We also still can drink booze even though its been outlawed before, what happened when they did that again?

Still not sure how they will control ever aspect of our lives