Search found 6 matches

by sjfcontrol
Tue Dec 04, 2012 5:19 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: You'll Love What DPS in Palo Pinto County is Doing!!
Replies: 200
Views: 35457

Re: You'll Love What DPS in Palo Pinto County is Doing!!

Abraham wrote:Jaguar,

I stand corrected.

Would you know if a simple Texas ID was free in the past or have I been misinformed all along?

Thanks

P.S. I always thought if it was free, I was being discriminated against as all my various licenses' cost came out of my pocket.

Why should others get a free ride...
From here: http://www.rockthevote.com/assets/publi ... oolkit.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
How can I apply for a free election ID certificate?
Visit a Texas Driver License office and request a free election ID certificate for the purpose of voting. Voters must provide:
1. Proof of identity.
2. A completed application.
3. Consent to be photographed and fingerprinted. 4. A signature.
by sjfcontrol
Mon Dec 03, 2012 8:55 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: You'll Love What DPS in Palo Pinto County is Doing!!
Replies: 200
Views: 35457

Re: You'll Love What DPS in Palo Pinto County is Doing!!

gigag04 wrote:
bronco78 wrote: Mid week, 2200, vehicle observed with a tail light out, plate run, no hits, insurance shows valid.. Lights go on.. driver turns on dome light, turn signal, and pulls over to a parking lot, window rolled down, music turned off, hands on the steering wheel.. contact made, driver makes eye contact and says "good evening, what can I do for you officer?" You ask for ID and insurance, you are handed DL, CHL, Insurance.

Assuming no embellishment from the LEO, and an honest assessment of the contact.. Can you give us an example of how YOU would articulate RS of a safety concern from a CHL to justify disarming in such a situation, to your department chief, the ADA, or a Judge?

Erik
I would explain how I conduct traffic stops during the night time. In the past, I have stopped and arrested CHL holders for DWI and assault family violence. I was made aware that the violator was carrying a loaded weapon while he was being detained for a violation. While the majority of CHL holders are law abiding citizens, in my training and experience (these words are overused, yes, but relevant) I find it safer to operate roadside by temporarily disarming the violator, as allowed under texas law, to ensure my safety. The location of this stop was a busy roadway, and in a high crime area. My senses are already competing for attention by monitoring the flow of cars for both of our safety, watching the violators movements, reading the DL, INS, listening to the radio, and making sure nobody approaches me from behind. These factors combined with monitoring an armed subject in a vehicle, at night time, while conducting the necessary checks of a traffic stop, present a possible, though remote, increase in danger and a threat to officer safety. As a result, the subject was temporarily disarmed for the remainder of the traffic stop.


...Something like that...all the above is reasonable, and not embellished. While I don't disarm CHL holders, I also don't step back to my vehicle because I can see them better. I do the same thing when I think there is dope in the car, but you wouldn't be able to tell by talking with me because I'm so charming :drool:
I would also (respectfully) point out that nothing in that explanation had anything to do with the specific stop in question, except that you knew the licensee was armed. If the legislature intended for you to be able to disarm ANY armed driver, it would not have placed the qualifications on the officers ability to disarm a licensee (I.e., somebodies safety). They would have simply said the officer may disarm at will.

Also, given that explanation, how do you protect yourself from the equivalent individual carrying under MPA where no notification is needed? Do you (theoretical you, not you spaeifically) ask everybody you stop if they're armed? What if they don't answer?
by sjfcontrol
Mon Dec 03, 2012 8:25 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: You'll Love What DPS in Palo Pinto County is Doing!!
Replies: 200
Views: 35457

Re: You'll Love What DPS in Palo Pinto County is Doing!!

57Coastie wrote:
sjfcontrol wrote:
JALLEN wrote:
emcee rib wrote:All this disarming and searching sounds like a good reason to get a nonresident license that doesn't show up on some antigun cop's computer. What the antigunners don't know can't be used to hurt me.
Doesn't Texas law require you to inform you are carrying whether you have a resident Texas CHL or some other state CHL?

I realize the penalty for not doing so has been deleted, but if the officer spots it but hasn't been told, there may be some unpleasantness.
The law only refers "license holder". So I'm guessing that would include out-of-state licenses. However, there is NO requirement to inform for MPA carry. And since the officer is very unlikely to know about other states licenses (unless you tell him), it would seem that not displaying and claiming MPA if discovered, would be a workable solution. IMO, IANAL.

In my opinion we would be doing a disservice to our common bond and inviting the law enforcement community to change its current positive attitude (in general) toward those holding CHLs, if we, regardless of there now not being a penalty, do not comply with the law by inventing a tricky way to avoid complying with the law.

Back in the day, in my service what is proposed here would have been referred to as "sea lawyering." I will go so far as to suggest that to not tell the truth to an LEO by way of one's intentional silence perhaps amounts to lying to him. If so, I think one will find that there is indeed a penalty for doing that.

If the fact that you are armed and have an out-of-state CHL comes to light, and I assure you I am capable of inventing such a scenario, sea-lawyering like suggested here would be an open invitation to reopening the question of the elimination of a penalty for failure to advise, and might likewise be an open invitation for a requirement to similarly advise the LEO of your exercising the MPA, with penalty for failure to do so.

Might a suggestion like this also affect some attitudes toward reciprocity?

As a minimum, as Mr. Allen suggests very politely, "there may be some unpleasantness." It may be rather ironic for a suggestion to made here in a thread started by an issue about LEO "unpleasantness." Has it been suggested that we avoid unpleasantness by inviting unpleasantness?

In short, I do not think this is the kind of advice we old-timers should be giving to newbies. I would think we should be responsible enough to educate them on what the law requires, not on how to get around what the law requires. To tell them that they are unlikely to be caught is, to me, not an acceptable excuse.

Jim
Or...
We can explain the law to "them" (newbies, as you named them). The implications of that law. The penalties if they are found (properly or improperly) in violation, and let them make up their own mind as to their comfort level for their activities. In this particular case, the law doesn't even specify a punishment for a CHL holder not displaying -- most likely because it is recognized that someone carrying in their vehicle WITHOUT a CHL (MPA) has no duty to inform, so why should a licensee? (Much less a licensee from another state?) The legislature hasn't quite gotten there yet, but I believe we are working in that direction.

I prefer to believe in the the intelligence of the "newbie", and their ability to work out their own comfort level.
by sjfcontrol
Mon Dec 03, 2012 8:01 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: You'll Love What DPS in Palo Pinto County is Doing!!
Replies: 200
Views: 35457

Re: You'll Love What DPS in Palo Pinto County is Doing!!

JALLEN wrote:
sjfcontrol wrote:
JALLEN wrote:
emcee rib wrote:All this disarming and searching sounds like a good reason to get a nonresident license that doesn't show up on some antigun cop's computer. What the antigunners don't know can't be used to hurt me.
Doesn't Texas law require you to inform you are carrying whether you have a resident Texas CHL or some other state CHL?

I realize the penalty for not doing so has been deleted, but if the officer spots it but hasn't been told, there may be some unpleasantness.
The law only refers "license holder". So I'm guessing that would include out-of-state licenses. However, there is NO requirement to inform for MPA carry. And since the officer is very unlikely to know about other states licenses (unless you tell him), it would seem that not displaying and claiming MPA if discovered, would be a workable solution. IMO, IANAL.
Does the MPA allow you to have the weapon on your person, like in an IWB on your belt, or is it merely to have a loaded weapon in the car somewhere?
It allowes you to have a loaded handgun anywhere in a vehicle you own, or is under your control. That CAN be on your person, but you can't step out of the vehicle with it.
by sjfcontrol
Sun Dec 02, 2012 9:51 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: You'll Love What DPS in Palo Pinto County is Doing!!
Replies: 200
Views: 35457

Re: You'll Love What DPS in Palo Pinto County is Doing!!

JALLEN wrote:
emcee rib wrote:All this disarming and searching sounds like a good reason to get a nonresident license that doesn't show up on some antigun cop's computer. What the antigunners don't know can't be used to hurt me.
Doesn't Texas law require you to inform you are carrying whether you have a resident Texas CHL or some other state CHL?

I realize the penalty for not doing so has been deleted, but if the officer spots it but hasn't been told, there may be some unpleasantness.
The law only refers "license holder". So I'm guessing that would include out-of-state licenses. However, there is NO requirement to inform for MPA carry. And since the officer is very unlikely to know about other states licenses (unless you tell him), it would seem that not displaying and claiming MPA if discovered, would be a workable solution. IMO, IANAL.

Return to “You'll Love What DPS in Palo Pinto County is Doing!!”