TexasCHLforum.com

gdanaher wrote:Tangentially, the local school district just posted a 30.06 sign at the entrance to the employee health clinic. This building is owned by the school district, and is funded by both the city government and the district. Employees of both agencies using thier employee health insurnace can utilize the clinic and it keeps the costs down for everyone. Anyway--the building is owned by the district so a chl holder would be in violation if he entered, sign or no sign. But the sign is posted on a government building/school building. Perhaps the city employees and dependents might not realize it i school property, but the sign seems out of place.

"owned by the district so a chl holder would be in violation if he entered"
maybe, maybe not...
Agree on govt owned building so shouldn't be a 30.06 sign except unless a Gov't meeting
but
is it a school?
is it a hospital?

DA: Ex-HISD tutor off the hook on gun charge
By Robert Stanton, Erin Mulvaney | February 7, 2013 | Updated: February 8, 2013 12:10am

http://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas ... NewsLetter" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Hope she has a lawyer to look into civil rights violations - Title 42 of the United States Code (42 USC 1983)


How'd someone find out? ....My bet is on >>> Loose Lips Sink Ships

bayouhazard wrote:$500 is a lot of money for someone making $20,000 a year and commuting 45 miles each way to work.

I hope she finds a better paying job closer to home. And without a gun ban.

I still hope she gets a nice settlement for her trouble too.

Keith B wrote:

texanjoker wrote:I am reading the case file via the court website and it appears to have been dismissed. $5000 initial bail aka paying a bail bondsman 10% is still a loss of $500 for this. The affidavit also was as I described above, stating in a building. I wonder why the media didn't share that? Seems strange.

My guess is the complainant stated she had carried it in a building, and when they arrested her they found the gun in the car so chose to let the DA decide on pursuing the charge. The case was probably dismissed by the DA due to no credible evidence the gun had actually been in the building.

If this is actually the case and it was me, I would be going back with a civil lawsuit against the agency and anyone else who was party to the false arrest. At least to the point I got my bond costs, legal fees and some restitution for the hassle.

I wonder though, on the Federal Civil Rights suit for false arrest ... if the Federal Gun Free School Zone Act could be Limine'd out since no Federal charges were pressed, or if she might be incriminating herself in testifying in the civil suit such that charges could then be filed on the Federal charges....in fact creating sworn testimony as evidence to use against herself... just brainstorming (In which case ... I'd hate to be the one preparing her for Depositions)