they'll ban round bullets, 7 round, then 10 more round ones, then 30 round onesGlock 23 wrote:Or maybe the real agenda slipped out.....no ammunition, eventually guns and mags don't matter
soon we'll all need square ones
Return to “Co-Sponsor Of Bill Banning Magazines Demonstrates She Doesn'”
they'll ban round bullets, 7 round, then 10 more round ones, then 30 round onesGlock 23 wrote:Or maybe the real agenda slipped out.....no ammunition, eventually guns and mags don't matter
TxRVer wrote:She's more dangerous than a hunnert round bullet.
Congresswoman Diana DeGette (D-CO) who, along with Rep. Carolyn McCarthy, reintroduced the house bill to ban magazines capable of holding more than ten rounds of ammunition was involved in a Denver Post public forum on gun control yesterday.
During the forum, she was asked about the efficacy of banning these kinds of magazines when there are tens of millions of them in circulation. Rep DeGette's response revealed a complete ignorance of the item which she is seeking to ban.
OOPS I reused mine, were they supposed to be used only once-disposable throw away when empty?"What's the efficacy of banning these magazine clips? I will tell you, these are ammunition, they're bullets, so the people who have those now, they're going to shoot them" says Rep DeGette.
According to her, "the number of these high capacity magazines is going to decrease dramatically over time because the bullets will be shot and there won't be any more available."