Search found 2 matches

by Ol Zeke
Fri May 14, 2010 11:49 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: An argument against 30.06
Replies: 82
Views: 16116

Re: An argument against 30.06

G26ster wrote:I agree with what you've said Charles, but unless I am misunderstanding PC 30.05, a CHL is at greater risk if he/she violates the trespass law. According to PC 30.05 penalties are elevated from Class C and B misdemeanors to a Class A, IF I am carrying under my CHL (a deadly weapon) at the time. Please tell me I'm wrong. I'll feel a lot better.
:headscratch

Ooops...
by Ol Zeke
Thu May 13, 2010 8:02 am
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: An argument against 30.06
Replies: 82
Views: 16116

Re: An argument against 30.06

I believe, without a doubt, that all CHL legislation, to date, has been a giant leap forward.
30.06 is no exception to this. However, I sincerely hope that none of the legislation to date has or is believed to have “hit the wall” and cannot go further.

I, personally, would not have a problem with private property owners restricting access to anyone, regardless of their reason, except…… that is not the law. I (we) don’t break laws just because we disagree with them. Our only recourse is to work to get them changed or repealed.

Unfortunately, this is dependent on political climate. I hope that the political climate of Texas is changing, for the better. While there may be little hope of changing federal laws, we may be able to change Texas laws. We must press forward. We haven’t hit the wall, yet. :banghead:

I agree that criminalizing an, otherwise, legal act or possession is wrong. However, right now, it is ‘the law’. What can be done to change or improve it? :headscratch

One other thought. I’m a simple person. I try to keep my principles and actions simple and logical. I’ve tried very hard to keep ‘Common Sense’ alive in my life and in my family (even though I have heard that it is deceased elsewhere). If I park my car in a public parking lot (legally carrying) and proceed to the doors of a ‘public accommodation’ (again, legally carrying) and find that everyone that I passed on my way to the door is allowed entry (whether they are legally carrying, or not), and I am not allowed to enter, that is discrimination. It’s actually worse than discrimination, because, if I continue, I am now a criminal. Where is the logic in that?! :roll:

:tiphat:

Return to “An argument against 30.06”