TexasCHLforum.com

baldeagle wrote:

DevilDawg wrote:I will refrain from responding to the personal attacks from the valued members as it won't benefit the thread or add anything of value to the board as a whole. As to the rest I wish you the best and enjoy the products. I can't help those that have no desire to learn.

Translation: I won't respond to what I consider to be personal attacks except to get one last dig in myself, you dummies.

Thanks for clearing that up for us.

DevilDawg wrote:

C-dub wrote:I'm sorry. I can't put together who S&W is in your post. The only thing I can think of is Smith & Wesson. If that's it I don't understand how you're applying it.

Yes, Smith & Wesson and here is a link from the nra records. If they had to face the same firestorm then that the internet has put on Magpul now, there might have been a little less celebration by the Clinton team.

http://www.nraila.org/news-issues/news- ... l-out.aspx" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

To the resolute supporters of magpul:
If a person can't see the expert level marketing spin being pulled over their eyes by Magpul now, you are better parted with your money to prevent you from aiding and abeting any further as the battle continues for our Uninfringed Rights.