Return to “17y/o Killed By Neighborhood Watch/CHL”
*You'resjfcontrol wrote:KeithB -- YOUR FIRED!Keith B wrote:Darn it, I was supposed to lock this before it hit 200 pages. Got busy and it missed it. Oh well, carry on.
Oops, sorry, thought I was Donald Trump there for a minute. Nevermind.
You are now qualified to vote Democrat.canvasbck wrote:Yeah, I miscounted. I'm ashamed of me.
That's how I feel about the whole fiasco, too.K.Mooneyham wrote:It really doesn't matter what the that witness says, exactly. She's just part of the motions on the way to convicting George Zimmerman for political reasons. I'm sorry, but my faith in our overall "justice system" is ebbing rapidly. I'll be truly amazed if he is acquitted.
That's about the sum of it.suthdj wrote:Civilized lynching.
True enough.Panda wrote:I think that was inevitable once BO declared what verdict he expects.SQLGeek wrote:Saw this today...seems the deck is stacked against him.
A certain CHL instructor has said before that a prosecutor's job isn't to pursue truth and justice, it is to get his boss reelected. Hard to find much that's not true with that statement.VMI77 wrote:Prosecutors suppress evidence all the time....usually they don't get caught. Plenty of prosecutors are not any more interested in the truth than the defense is.jmra wrote:The ironic thing here is that it is almost always the defense that is trying to suppress evidence and the prosecution the one crying about not being able to do he job if the evidence is suppressed.The Annoyed Man wrote:Yes, it makes sense in a sick twisted way. Prosecution maintains that Martin is the victim here, when most of us suspect that Zimmerman is the victim, who successfully defended himself from a punk thug. Prosecution's case against Zimmerman falls apart if Martin's record is admitted into evidence. There is a reason they MUST convict Zimmerman........he's not their real target. Their real target is Florida's "Stand Your Ground" law, which is what the Martin entourage set out to blame the shooting on. (...even though that is not really an issue here; Zimmerman didn't "stand his ground." He was getting his butt handed to him during a fight for his life, on his back, with a younger, larger, stronger, thug on top of him, and he had the scalp lacerations on the back of his head and the broken nose to prove it. Zimmerman did not reach for his gun until Martin tried to take it from him while issuing a verbal threat to use the gun on Zimmerman.) If Martin's record can be introduced into evidence, it bolsters Zimmerman's claim of self-defense.philip964 wrote:http://www.clickorlando.com/news/state- ... index.html
Prosecution seeks to not allow Trayvon's past to be brought up at trial.
Any of this make any sense?
There is something really corrupt about a prosecution which depends on suppressing the truth to arrive at a verdict they can live with......because living with the truth is not acceptable. THAT is the kind of crap liberals foster.
