Well, there you go.
Have fun and enjoy the trip. For me the education was costly. Others, not nearly so.
Larry is in charge these days. The problems supposedly have been corrected. Still can't see the logic of a .380 when mini 9X19s are out there.
Best to you.
sd.
Search found 3 matches
Return to “NAA vs Seecamp vs AMT”
- Sun Jul 17, 2011 3:53 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: NAA vs Seecamp vs AMT
- Replies: 16
- Views: 7720
- Sat Jul 16, 2011 3:02 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: NAA vs Seecamp vs AMT
- Replies: 16
- Views: 7720
Re: NAA vs Seecamp vs AMT
Can't help with that.
Pre Kahr, I logged lots of miles on a PPK .380. Can't seem much reason for the .380 PPK now.
My occasional 'shirt pocket', strapped in the seat belt, sitting on the porcelean throne, etc., options are the NAA or J frame.
salty
Pre Kahr, I logged lots of miles on a PPK .380. Can't seem much reason for the .380 PPK now.
My occasional 'shirt pocket', strapped in the seat belt, sitting on the porcelean throne, etc., options are the NAA or J frame.
salty
- Sat Jul 16, 2011 9:27 am
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: NAA vs Seecamp vs AMT
- Replies: 16
- Views: 7720
Re: NAA vs Seecamp vs AMT
I've had two Seecamps and one NAA, all .32 ACP.
Supposedly, the Seecamp crew had some problems sorting out the family pecking order. Whatever the cause, quality control and cust service suffered. 'Phones went un-answered for a while. The two .32s that I had didn't want to play nice with any ammunition, recoil spring and Mag spring sgave up the ghost way too early. I'm told that, that is a thing of the past now and isn't relevant. If you want to look into it, there was a Seecamp Forum out there somewhere.
The NAA Guardian has kept on ticking for about ten years now. Every few years, I swap out the mag springs and the recoil spring. So far, all that has been gratis.
Currently, the NAA is loaded with Buffalo Bore hard cast, 75 grain, RNFP at 1140 fps.
Using 'recycled' 'phone books as a tell, the Buffalo Bore functions, penetrates almost as deeply as Ball, but more than Silver Tip WW, and waay more costly. That doesn't mean much of anything other than I like shooting 'phone books in the back yard.
Your experiences may, most likely will, vary. Pay your money and roll the dice. With this Guardian, I got a winner.
salty
Supposedly, the Seecamp crew had some problems sorting out the family pecking order. Whatever the cause, quality control and cust service suffered. 'Phones went un-answered for a while. The two .32s that I had didn't want to play nice with any ammunition, recoil spring and Mag spring sgave up the ghost way too early. I'm told that, that is a thing of the past now and isn't relevant. If you want to look into it, there was a Seecamp Forum out there somewhere.
The NAA Guardian has kept on ticking for about ten years now. Every few years, I swap out the mag springs and the recoil spring. So far, all that has been gratis.
Currently, the NAA is loaded with Buffalo Bore hard cast, 75 grain, RNFP at 1140 fps.
Using 'recycled' 'phone books as a tell, the Buffalo Bore functions, penetrates almost as deeply as Ball, but more than Silver Tip WW, and waay more costly. That doesn't mean much of anything other than I like shooting 'phone books in the back yard.
Your experiences may, most likely will, vary. Pay your money and roll the dice. With this Guardian, I got a winner.
salty