The passenger didn't "intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly" do anything. He was a passenger... a spectator, if you will. There is no law against being near a handgun, unless you "intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly" carry it.
Search found 1 match
Return to “DPS Stop near Luling. Is this typical?”
- Fri Aug 05, 2011 9:18 am
- Forum: LEO Contacts & Bloopers
- Topic: DPS Stop near Luling. Is this typical?
- Replies: 49
- Views: 10275
Re: DPS Stop near Luling. Is this typical?
I think you guys are getting hung up on the wrong part of the statute.
The passenger didn't "intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly" do anything. He was a passenger... a spectator, if you will. There is no law against being near a handgun, unless you "intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly" carry it.
The passenger didn't "intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly" do anything. He was a passenger... a spectator, if you will. There is no law against being near a handgun, unless you "intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly" carry it.