knotquiteawake wrote:I think its possible he will get charged if the following is true:
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/he-got- ... -to-death/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
After pulling the attacker off of her, the father repeatedly struck the man in the head.
If he pulled the man off his daughter then at that point the assault has been stopped. To then beat the man in the head to death looks more like vengeful homicide. Once the crime is no longer in progress I think he would not be covered by the law anymore. If he pulled the man off his daughter how then is deadly force necessary? The crime has been stopped.
What do you guys think? If I were the prosecutor that is the direction I would go with it.
You might just have a lot of trouble keeping your job, among other things, some much harder to replace.
