Astute observation my friendTamie wrote:So far, the people who like Frontsight are people who trained there, and the people who don't like Frontsight are people who didn't train there. That's an interesting split.
James
Return to “Anyone been to the Frontsight training”
Astute observation my friendTamie wrote:So far, the people who like Frontsight are people who trained there, and the people who don't like Frontsight are people who didn't train there. That's an interesting split.
Show me where I have been "uncharitable" and "hostile". You sir, are judging me for something that I'm not guilty of.Hoi Polloi wrote: The uncharitable and hostile defense of the place combined with the minimization of a person's death that I'm seeing here just reassures me that I'm right.
Sadly, invariably, discussion of Front Sight usually degrades into a vocal minority, who shout down anyone that has anything favorable to say about the place.Wanted to see if anyone has been to the frontsight training and one really gets all the material and gifts that are mention in the ads.
Just to be clear, while tragic, and certainly a gut wrenching thing to have to live with, it had nothing to do with firearms.AndyC wrote:Fine: http://www.8newsnow.com/Global/story.asp?s=6847907" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;extremist wrote:Please provide evidence of anyone dying at Front Sight due to Range Officer negligence. I don't believe you can.Gee, I had forgotten all about the class-action lawsuit and also failing to meet fire-safety standards 4 times in 2 years.The accident on July 4th is the subject of a criminal investigation. The I-Team learned late Thursday the Nye County sheriff's office plans to recommend felony charges against two of the instructors involved in the accident. Detectives believe their actions rise to the level of criminal negligence.
Fair enough - my apologies if I took that the wrong way.extremist wrote:My "internet commando" comment wasn't intended directly at you but those on the internet who disparage Front Sight without having been there and having first hand knowledge.
Gotcha. And as I replied, fortunately I have not been put in that position AND I NEVER SAID I HAD. What percentage of the top IDPA MA and EX class shooters, have? What percentage of the top USPSA GM and M shooters have? Does that make them any less qualified to talk about what is good training and what is not?baldeagle wrote:He's referring to a range where the bullets go two ways; from you and towards you. There's nothing like a live fire exercise to get your attention and make you seriously question your commitment to the armed forces. Not to mention teach you how to eat dirt and make yourself real thin and flat.extremist wrote:As for two-way range? I not sure what you are talking about.
Referring to people on other boards that like to slam Front Sight training when they know nothing about it.Charles L. Cotton wrote:Who are you referring to?extremist wrote:If you want real feedback from someone who has been there several times, and not some internet commando second hand drivel, then feel free to contact me.'
extremist wrote:And with regards to the slam above, how many accidental shootings have occurred at the other big schools (i.e. Recently GUNSITE)? How many were shooter carelessness? And how many were law enforcement (doing it their way). Look it up. AND what rate per students trained?
I have no numbers for Thunder Ranch. I know of at least two incidents at Gunsite that have occured in the past, one very recently (although not fatal). My point was, you cannot single out Front Sight and say that's the only training facility that has accidental shootings.Give us the numbers please. As for Thunder Ranch, I believe the answer is still none.
extremist wrote:FS trains more regular people every year than all the other schools COMBINED.
No, it is Wes LaHullier, the operations director at Front Sight.What is the source for this statement? I hope it's not Dr. Piazza
Of course, old news, not relevant to the TRAINING aspect of the school.Did you know of the class action lawsuit that was filed and the claims made?
No, didn't see that. I for one like the promotional CD that was put together that is given out if you request it, or attend the courses. Of course there were grandiose plans that were in the video that now are not realistically going to be completed. But the training facilities that are there now and operational are good and improvements are made each year. Will he ever reach his goal of building out? Who knows.Did you see the absurd promotional CD that Front Sight/Dr. Piazza sent to all IDPA members through IDPA HQ a few years ago? If so, what did you think of the claims?
Sorry I hit a sore spot with you, that was not my intention. I was just offering an answer to the poster that had some first hand knowledge and experience with the training and the materials - which is what he asked. I don't consider that "promoting" Front Sight.Go to FS as much and as often as you like, but TexasCHLforum will not be used to promote it.
Please provide evidence of anyone dying at Front Sight due to Range Officer negligence. I don't believe you can.AndyC wrote: First off - I said that I believe that their training is ok - and that is based on the opinions of people I know and respect who have attended. Not outstanding, nor unique - but ok.
However - when someone dies on a training course as a result of negligence of the staff (in my sole opinion), then alarm bells seriously begin to ring for me.
As for the "internet commando" comment - well, some of the folks on the forum here have spent a lot of actual time on the two-way range, not just puffed and waddled their way through a few courses on a weekend. Now, seeing as you raised the subject, I believe that it's only fair to give you your say, so let's hear it: what's your claim to fame, then?
I provided him with my input.Wanted to see if anyone has been to the frontsight training and one really gets all the material and gifts that are mention in the ads.