pt145ss wrote:After reading and re-reading the code several times, i must admit that I was wrong and you guys are right. I think i was having a mental block. I could not (and still to some extent) can get passed the notion that it is immediately necessary to shoot a fleeing suspect in the back. Maybe I just believe that once the BG turned and ran that there is no longer an immediate threat...and giving chase and possibly pushing a bad situation over a wallet or something that can be replaced is just not worth it to me. So I guess I was blinded by my moral judgments about the situation when I should have read the code for what it is.
Thanks for forcing me to read the code in a more objective manner.
I think the difference here is that we are dealing with TWO different things. Not many would argue that anyone is justified in using deadly force while defending THEMSELVES. Its pretty much a no brainer.
However, it seems that Texas also allows for the use of deadly force to protect your PROPERTY. Many will argue that morally, KILLING someone over a wallet, or microwave is unconscionable.
However, using deadly force on a psycho setting your home on fire would probably get a few pats on the back.