Charles, I corrected my "quoting" if I was the person you was referring to.Charles L. Cotton wrote:Right now I'm mad at everything in the universe, so I'm pretty much out of patience.safety1 wrote:So because LEOs as a whole perceived this as a slap in the face, the bill goes down?Charles L. Cotton wrote:While it would have been in statute, in the real world and courts, it was little more than a policy statement. It was a good policy statement, but it was also a slap in the face to law enforcement because it was a legislative statement that LEOs are not to be trusted. It doesn't matter if anyone agrees with that or not (I do not), that's how the Dutton amendment has been perceived.
Chas.![]()
They (LEOs) mainly in the larger cities didn't support HB910 anyway.
With that said, stop putting words in my mouth!!! I pointed out why the Dutton amendment has become a problem; I didn't say that HB910 was dead.
Chas.
I didn't feel like I was putting words in your mouth....I was asking a question.
I apologize if it came off that way.