My first read through the notice does not reveal to me a way to provide comments on-line, which would seem to be a paperwork burden reduction opportunity itself! You apparently have to mail them in. Appears to be a 60-day period. The notice is dated 28 Apr 08, so it appears it is already one week into the period.Form 4473 under Paperwork Reduction Act review
Here's the Federal Register notice, in pdf.
Basically, under the Paperwork Reduction Act, every agency is required to file, with the Office of Management and Budget, any form it has that requests info from the public, together with its estimate of how many hours are spent filling in the form (for 4473, ATFE estimates 4.3 million hours annually; they estimate 10 million are filled out at 25 minutes each.
Then every so many years it comes up for OMB review, and the public can send comments suggesting how the time burden can be reduced. (One that comes to my mind: how about eliminating the requirement for detailed info, in the vast majority of cases where the buyer is presenting state-issued ID that already has all that recorded?)
Want to Change ATF Form 4473? Act now...
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
Want to Change ATF Form 4473? Act now...
Found this post over at Dave Hardy's Of Arms and the Law blog:
USAF 1982-2005
____________
____________
-
- Banned
- Posts: 2173
- Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 1:24 pm
- Location: Smithville, TX
Re: Want to Change ATF Form 4473? Act now...
What's the point? Other than doing away with it completely, I can't see where any changes would make any difference.
The main purpose of the 4473 is to provide a means to do forward traces. The secondary purpose is to establish the potential (for someday, when the law might be changed to allow for it) to put all of the info into a database in so doing accomplish defacto registration.
No way will the Feds give either of those abilities up.
The rest is just window dressing. (Like I'm sure a lot of people disqualify themselves by checking the boxes indicating that they were druggies, mental cases, or felons.)
The main purpose of the 4473 is to provide a means to do forward traces. The secondary purpose is to establish the potential (for someday, when the law might be changed to allow for it) to put all of the info into a database in so doing accomplish defacto registration.
No way will the Feds give either of those abilities up.
The rest is just window dressing. (Like I'm sure a lot of people disqualify themselves by checking the boxes indicating that they were druggies, mental cases, or felons.)
Ahm jus' a Southern boy trapped in a Yankee's body
Re: Want to Change ATF Form 4473? Act now...
How about being able to use mailing abbreviations? Like TX for Texas, or Rd. fr Road, etc.
Remember, in a life-or-death situation, when seconds count, the police are only minutes away.
Barre
Barre
Re: Want to Change ATF Form 4473? Act now...
Or giving more space to write them in.barres wrote:How about being able to use mailing abbreviations? Like TX for Texas, or Rd. fr Road, etc.
NRA Endowment Member
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5317
- Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:27 pm
- Location: Luling, TX
Re: Want to Change ATF Form 4473? Act now...
As someone pointed out, the use of abbreviations would be nice. In addition to making the form easier for us to fill out and understand, allowing abbreviations would reduce the number of technical violations that could be found by an inspection of a dealer. The easier it is for dealers to stay in business, and the more of them we keep, the better off we are.frankie_the_yankee wrote:What's the point? Other than doing away with it completely, I can't see where any changes would make any difference.
But I think we might be able to get rid of it now. It would take a little work politically, but the form is now obsolete. If the real purpose of the form is to provide information to prove the person is allowed to own a gun, we don't need it. Everyone who buys a gun from a dealer is already proven to be legal, either by showing a CHL or by running them through a NICS check.
As for the trace information (and registration data), we could just use the bound book all dealers are required to keep too.
Failing the removal of the form, we could try for a retention period, say 5 years. After that long, the odds of the form still being accurate in any respect are pretty small. The address will probably be off or the person no longer owns the firearm. This would ease the burden on some dealers also.
But I agree that the only change I see as remotely possible right now would be the use of abbreviations. They will not get rid of the form.
Steve Rothstein
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 245
- Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2008 7:05 pm
- Location: North East Dallas County
- Contact:
Re: Want to Change ATF Form 4473? Act now...

"Go to the sporting goods store and bring me the form 4473..."
Ok, on a serious note... I would love either more space to write in or to be able to abbreviate.
Don't wait for your ship to come in, swim out to it...kill the captain...and claim it as yours. : Lodge2004
-
- Banned
- Posts: 2173
- Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 1:24 pm
- Location: Smithville, TX
Re: Want to Change ATF Form 4473? Act now...
I have no proof of this, but I think the real reason why they are so fussy with abbreviations is related to their someday dream of scanning all the 4473's into a registration database. As it is, the software has to recognize handwriting. But it would take a major reprogramming effort to give it the ability to equate "Y" with "YES" or "TX with "Texas". To say nothing with handling incorrect abbreviations like "TENN" for Tennesee for instance.srothstein wrote: As someone pointed out, the use of abbreviations would be nice. In addition to making the form easier for us to fill out and understand, allowing abbreviations would reduce the number of technical violations that could be found by an inspection of a dealer. The easier it is for dealers to stay in business, and the more of them we keep, the better off we are.
Not as a means to registration.srothstein wrote: But I think we might be able to get rid of it now. It would take a little work politically, but the form is now obsolete.
The quote from the movie "Red Dawn" is right on.
Ahm jus' a Southern boy trapped in a Yankee's body
Re: Want to Change ATF Form 4473? Act now...
The form asks for City, state, zip
A lot of folks miss the COUNTY.
Which isn't really needed if you want to find the guy that bought the gun.
A lot of folks miss the COUNTY.
Which isn't really needed if you want to find the guy that bought the gun.
See you at the range
NRA Life, TSRA Life, USPSA Life, Mensa (not worth $50 per year so it's expired)
Tom (Retired May 2019) Neal
NRA Life, TSRA Life, USPSA Life, Mensa (not worth $50 per year so it's expired)
Tom (Retired May 2019) Neal
- CleverNickname
- Senior Member
- Posts: 650
- Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 6:36 pm
Re: Want to Change ATF Form 4473? Act now...
The most recent iteration of the 4473 now has a separate box for the county.tomneal wrote:The form asks for City, state, zip
A lot of folks miss the COUNTY.