Jareds - again

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

srothstein
Senior Member
Posts: 5319
Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:27 pm
Location: Luling, TX

Re: Jareds - again

Post by srothstein »

T3hK1w1 wrote:51% signs posted at hospitals are valid, actually.
Not really. They do not get 51% of their income from the sale of alcoholic beverages for on premises consumption. So, they are basically invalid on that premise. But, there is still a law requiring the hospitals to post the same wording as the 51% sign without the red 51 on it. The problem is the law saying this is a valid sign is no longer valid.

We have an interesting problem now with conflicting laws. The old law made the hospital off limits and required the notice. The new law says the hospital is not off limits unless it is posted with a 30.06 sign. The only case which would be 100% sure is if a hospital posted both signs. I find it ludicrous that the law could possibly intend for the posting of two signs. This leads me to think the newer law requiring the 30.06 posting would be the only valid one, but I have previously posted that other cops and DA's and judges might think either sign is valid warning under the law. I can see their logic also. It is going to take a volunteer to be charged and fight it to the appeals court level to get a case law precedent on what is actually required at a hospital.
Steve Rothstein
User avatar
Liberty
Senior Member
Posts: 6343
Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 8:49 pm
Location: Galveston
Contact:

Re: Jareds - again

Post by Liberty »

T3hK1w1 wrote:51% signs posted at hospitals are valid, actually.
I don't believe they are.
Don't have time to look it up, and post the relevant law, but basically the law clearly states that a 30.06 needs to be post.

I think you are refering to an obsolete law. The 51% sign in itself has no legal weight for us CHL holders.
Liberty''s Blog
"Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom." John F. Kennedy
israel67
Member
Posts: 175
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 10:43 am
Location: Paris, France

Re: Jareds - again

Post by israel67 »

nitrogen wrote:Besides, theowner of the Garland locations knows how to defend himself
The scary thing about that story is that he didn't hit the bad guy.

I or someone I care about might just be walking by one of those stores when the owner opens up. If his bullets aren't hitting the BG ... where are they going ? :confused5
שמע, ישראל: יהוה אלהינו, יהוה אחד
User avatar
barres
Senior Member
Posts: 1118
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Prison City, Texas

Re: Jareds - again

Post by barres »

T3hK1w1 wrote:51% signs posted at hospitals are valid, actually.
Not valid in the sense that they mean anything to CHL'ers,because they don't (at least none that I've ever seen) conform to 30.06 requirements, but hospitals are apparently required to post them. It apparently stems from the time when hospitals were off-limits without having to post 30.06, IIRC.

ETA: Wow. Beaten to the punch by two others and a third comment slipped in for good measure. I must be really slow today!

Further ETA: Nope. I was silly enough to overlook the next button at the bottom of the page. Oops. :oops:
Remember, in a life-or-death situation, when seconds count, the police are only minutes away.

Barre
User avatar
DoubleJ
Senior Member
Posts: 2367
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 9:29 am
Location: Seattle, Washington

Re: Jareds - again

Post by DoubleJ »

israel67 wrote:The scary thing about that story is that he didn't hit the bad guy.

I or someone I care about might just be walking by one of those stores when the owner opens up. If his bullets aren't hitting the BG ... where are they going ? :confused5
he was kinda far away. and I think this goes to the ol' rule that says something to the effect of "Know your target and what's beyond it..." or sumpin' like that.
anyway, maybe this guy could tell his bullets wouldn't do any damage if he missed, or maybe he didn't think of it. either way, we'll never know.
as a side note, I like how the article mentioned he was a trained marksmen, or something to that effect.
apparently not! :lol:
FWIW, IIRC, AFAIK, FTMP, IANAL. YMMV.
User avatar
Bart
Senior Member
Posts: 718
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:23 pm
Location: Deep in the Heart
Contact:

Re: Jareds - again

Post by Bart »

Rokyudai wrote:They might be able to get away with that at 'DeBeers' Jewelry.
:biggrinjester:
A diamond is forever but you only rent de beers.
Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.
israel67
Member
Posts: 175
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 10:43 am
Location: Paris, France

Re: Jareds - again

Post by israel67 »

Bart wrote:
Rokyudai wrote:They might be able to get away with that at 'DeBeers' Jewelry.
:biggrinjester:
A diamond is forever but you only rent de beers.
"rlol" :smilelol5:
שמע, ישראל: יהוה אלהינו, יהוה אחד
Rokyudai
Senior Member
Posts: 640
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 9:56 pm
Location: San Antonio

Re: Jareds - again

Post by Rokyudai »

Bart wrote:
Rokyudai wrote:They might be able to get away with that at 'DeBeers' Jewelry.
:biggrinjester:
A diamond is forever but you only rent de beers.

Cheers Bart! ...I second and third that :cheers2:
NRA Benefactor Member
User avatar
stevie_d_64
Senior Member
Posts: 7590
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 11:17 pm
Location: 77504

Re: Jareds - again

Post by stevie_d_64 »

Rokyudai wrote:
Bart wrote:
Rokyudai wrote:They might be able to get away with that at 'DeBeers' Jewelry.
:biggrinjester:
A diamond is forever but you only rent de beers.

Cheers Bart! ...I second and third that :cheers2:
I agree, Bart really created a lot of facets through his statement there... ;-)
"Perseverance and Preparedness triumph over Procrastination and Paranoia every time.” -- Steve
NRA - Life Member
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"
Μολών λαβέ!
User avatar
Crossfire
Moderator
Posts: 5405
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 10:27 am
Location: DFW
Contact:

Re: Jareds - again

Post by Crossfire »

stevie_d_64 wrote: I agree, Bart really created a lot of facets through his statement there... ;-)
Well, that's just solid gold, right there! "rlol"
Texas LTC Instructor, FFL, IdentoGO Fingerprinting Partner
http://www.Crossfire-Training.com
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”