The lawyer sez: “I've never seen any game in Texas that would require a semiautomatic weapon to take down”
That's brilliant. Of course the right to bear arms in the second amendment is the right to bear arms against deer and doves, right? You would think a lawyer would know the difference.
I, too am getting pretty tired of the "Assault Rifle" and "Assault Weapons" verbiage when talking about evil black rifles. The little sidebar in the article about the guy who killed himself, his family and some cops with an AK-47 was especially nice. The guy wouldn't have gone on a killing spree if he had a deer rifle, right? Would he have remained a regular non-violent member of society if he were limited to owning a double-barrel shotgun? See, those "embrace weapons" make peaceful men out of villians, just like "assault weapons" make murderous thugs out of normal family men.
