Lathrop, Callifornia (east of Oakland), this date -- A a "multi-agency task force" was searching for a parolee when a dog assigned to the San Joaquin County Sheriff's Department bit a U.S. Marshall. The marshall reportedly shot the dog with fatal results.
http://www.news10.net/news/story.aspx?s ... 79&catid=2" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Professionals.
- Jim
CA: U.S. Marshall fatally shoots police K9
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
CA: U.S. Marshall fatally shoots police K9
Fear, anger, hatred, and greed. The devil's all-you-can-eat buffet.
Re: CA: U.S. Marshall fatally shoots police K9
seems a little harsh to me .
can't a well trained dog be allowed to make one mistake without paying the ultimate price ?
its not like it was a pit bull randomly attacking a child .
JMHO

can't a well trained dog be allowed to make one mistake without paying the ultimate price ?
its not like it was a pit bull randomly attacking a child .

JMHO
Glock Armorer - S&W M&P Armorer
Re: CA: U.S. Marshall fatally shoots police K9
Sounds like proper defense of life and limb to me. I don't think many people would just sit back and take it from such dogs if they had the means to stop such an attack. Police, like the rest of us are responsible for keeping their animals under control. THe dogs, like police officers usually pay the price for lack of training, poor policy, or bad command decisions.usa1 wrote:seems a little harsh to me .![]()
can't a well trained dog be allowed to make one mistake without paying the ultimate price ?
its not like it was a pit bull randomly attacking a child .![]()
JMHO
As we have seen if a dog attacks a police officer something or someone is is going to be shot. Sometimes its a miniture dachshund, sometimes its a its an NYC police officer.
Liberty''s Blog
"Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom." John F. Kennedy
"Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom." John F. Kennedy
Re: CA: U.S. Marshall fatally shoots police K9
I'm not sure I would let a dog chew on me for any length of time either. Sorry, but that stuff hurts!!!!
D
D

LaserTex
Air Force Retired ** Life Member VFW ** NRA Member **
** Life Member AmVets ** Patriot Guard Rider **
Air Force Retired ** Life Member VFW ** NRA Member **
** Life Member AmVets ** Patriot Guard Rider **
Re: CA: U.S. Marshall fatally shoots police K9
good point ..Liberty wrote: Sounds like proper defense of life and limb to me.
however , the impression i got from reading the story , was that the dog bit the officer .(perhaps accidentally)
and was not viciously attacking , which leads me to believe it was more of an accidental thing rather than a case of an animal going bad .
maybe he was having a bad day...
maybe the dog opened his 401K statement and saw how much of his retirement has been lost .
my wife bit me when she opened hers

Glock Armorer - S&W M&P Armorer
Re: CA: U.S. Marshall fatally shoots police K9
Imagine if it was a normal citizen who shot the police dog.
Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.
Re: CA: U.S. Marshall fatally shoots police K9
A non-LEO who shot a police dog would be lucky to live through the next three seconds, and undoubtedly would do jail time.
Here's a story with more details: http://www.recordnet.com/apps/pbcs.dll/ ... /907240324" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The way I read this, the marshal and another officer were struggling with a suspect who was resisting arrest. The K9 team rolled up, and the dog bit the marshal.
It sounds to me like a reflexive reaction. Maybe the marshal thought the suspect's "pit bull" was attacking him.
Also note that the dog had bitten a bystander several years ago.
- Jim
Here's a story with more details: http://www.recordnet.com/apps/pbcs.dll/ ... /907240324" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The way I read this, the marshal and another officer were struggling with a suspect who was resisting arrest. The K9 team rolled up, and the dog bit the marshal.
It sounds to me like a reflexive reaction. Maybe the marshal thought the suspect's "pit bull" was attacking him.
Also note that the dog had bitten a bystander several years ago.
- Jim
Re: CA: U.S. Marshall fatally shoots police K9
When did public servants become the masters?
Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.
Re: CA: U.S. Marshall fatally shoots police K9
The year 1935.
- Jim
- Jim