57Coastie wrote:92f-fan wrote:Assuming you haven't posted identifying information, think through how a prosecutor would tie entries here to you ?
If you didn't use your legal name as your handle a Google search wouldn't help.  Even if you did - depending on your name and what they serached for they will likely get thousands to millions of results.  How much time and expertise do they have to wade through that ?   
Assuming the prosecution was very technical and sure you were doing bad things on the Internet, they could attempt to subpoena every IP address you have been assigned and then subpoena every forum in a fishing expedition but I doubt that kind of fishing expedition would be approved.   
IMO 
Some how you would likely need to be tied to content here via offline means.  In other words it would likely have to come up in interrogations.  
Once all those hurdles were managed they would need to prove that the content was yours, was unaltered and was true.
"True??"
Keith is right, but you of course are entitled to your opinion.  BTW, I just Googled "92f-fan" and got 8 hits, most of them being your contributions to this forum.  If someone deludes himself by suggesting that his or her real name cannot be identified, he or she does so to their possible serious risk. 
Like all of us, I respect Chas. and his tireless endeavors for us, but I will stick my neck out and guess that if asked he would confirm that with the law the way it has been demonstrated to be today it is quite likely that he might have to comply with a subpoena requiring him to identify you, given the right case.  Let there by no misunderstanding.  being the confirmed Liberal with a capital "L" that I am, I am distressed by the fact that most courts will do this today, but that doesn't change the fact that most will. I could probably prove this to your satisfaction by credibly saying here that I intend to kill a public figure, which, of course, is not the case.  I would not be surprised if the NSA or DHS read the post before you did and I soon heard a knock on my door, if it were not shattered and broken open.  
One's opinion is one's own, and all are at liberty to express them, but others are certainly not required by the 1st Amendment to agree with them.  
I stand by mine.
Jim
 
No one said you had to agree.  Its an opinion.  
Im not saying it cant be done - of course with enough information you can be associated with lots of info.  The point I was trying to make is that in most cases some NON Internet based info would need to point them here first.  THEN they still have the same challenges of associating a username with a person.  Which would involve 2 or more subpoenas.  
In your Google example.  You started with specific information that matters here.  if you started with my legal name, which is all you would have to start an investigation.  You would find nothing that points here.  
I manage 2 webservers hosting over a dozen forums like this one.  Been doing it for 10+ years.  I have a little experience in this area.  Been subpoenaed a couple times. 
Assuming the technology is able as a previous poster suggested to read key strokes from earth orbit, that satellite still has to be TASKED to YOUR issue before it matters in this case, in the same way that IF the District Attorney has the technical ability to find and use this kind of info the resources that CAN do that are limited and wont likely be brought to bear on just ANY case.   
Having said all that I used a different username on this forum than I have for others.  And I keep track of my Google Presence.  Ive posted 10's of thousands of times under another username on dozens of forums and none of them can be tracked to me just based on Google.  
You question on deleted information is a good one. Most file systems simply mark information as deleted.  The only time the information is really removed is when that space on the drive is used for new data.   One way to understand it is to assume the drive uses a table of contents or Index to know where data is on the drive.  When you delete a file you don't actually remove data - you simply remove the entry in the table of contents for that data, and you mark the space as eligible for a write operation.  So to UNDELETE the data all you have to do is scan the unindexed space for information that might be a file.  Assuming the data was not overwritten or was only over written once its pretty easy to recover.  Of course this all assumes that the information isnt backed up. The same issues would exist for the backups if there were any.  
Having said all that, this forum data is written in a database.  Once an entry in a database is removed in many cases its unrecoverable since many databases almost instantly reuse that space for future entries.  Again assuming no backups that contained the deleted data.
This doesn't mean you shouldn't be prudent with what you put in the Internet - Use common sense 
It was simply a discussion of the technical background of the question