Accidentally Shot With 45-70 (pic)

Topics that do not fit anywhere else. Absolutely NO discussions of religion, race, or immigration!

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Post Reply
dihappy
Senior Member
Posts: 907
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 8:00 pm
Location: San Antonio

Accidentally Shot With 45-70 (pic)

Post by dihappy »

Got this from one my regular forums.
My cousin and a buddy were sighting their rifles in. One of the guns was leaned up against the 4 wheeler he was standing on. The gun started to fall and I'm not sure if his buddy grabbed it, or something on the bike caught the trigger. Either way, he caught a 325 grain ballistic tip 45-70 round right under the collar bone. This pic is of the exit wound. I just spoke with him for the first time, since it has happened, he said he was sore. You think! I think it goes with out being said, how lucky he is to still be here. But, I told him anyways!
Image


Yikes! Wish i knew how it really fired.
Image
User avatar
C-dub
Senior Member
Posts: 13579
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 7:18 pm
Location: DFW

Re: Accidentally Shot With 45-70 (pic)

Post by C-dub »

Ouch!!! And eewwww!
I am not and have never been a LEO. My avatar is in honor of my friend, Dallas Police Sargent Michael Smith, who was murdered along with four other officers in Dallas on 7.7.2016.
NRA Patriot-Endowment Lifetime Member---------------------------------------------Si vis pacem, para bellum.................................................Patriot Guard Rider
User avatar
The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts: 26885
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Accidentally Shot With 45-70 (pic)

Post by The Annoyed Man »

If this is the exit wound from a round that entered under his collarbone (which is on the front of his body), what is that nearly as large second wound in the back of his neck? There are no bony structures in the human body located between ribs on the front and the scapula on the rear that would be substantial enough to cause a 325 grain 45-70 ballistic tip which entered at point blank range to fragment into two pieces, causing two separate and equally devastating exit wounds a foot and a half apart (when the entrance wound is only 12-13 inches away. Also, the lower wound's upper right quadrant forms a nearly perfect right angle, indicating that there was flesh trimmed away with a scalpel for medical/surgical reasons — which means that this wound was not originally as large. And finally, given the apparent exit angle of the lower wound, I'm guessing that the wound in the neck is the actual entrance wound, and I would dispute that it was a gunshot wound to begin with. It looks more like he was pierced with a spear-like object. If that is a gunshot exit wound and the entrance was in the front under the collar bone, the entrance would have to have been on the right side under the collar bone — which means that our victim had his mediastinum transected, the aortic arch blown out, possibly the superior vena cava. The wound would have been almost instantly fatal. He doesn't look dead to me.

Color me a little bit skeptical.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
User avatar
marksiwel
Banned
Posts: 1964
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 4:35 pm
Location: Cedar Park/Austin

Re: Accidentally Shot With 45-70 (pic)

Post by marksiwel »

The Annoyed Man wrote:If this is the exit wound from a round that entered under his collarbone (which is on the front of his body), what is that nearly as large second wound in the back of his neck? There are no bony structures in the human body located between ribs on the front and the scapula on the rear that would be substantial enough to cause a 325 grain 45-70 ballistic tip which entered at point blank range to fragment into two pieces, causing two separate and equally devastating exit wounds a foot and a half apart (when the entrance wound is only 12-13 inches away. Also, the lower wound's upper right quadrant forms a nearly perfect right angle, indicating that there was flesh trimmed away with a scalpel for medical/surgical reasons — which means that this wound was not originally as large. And finally, given the apparent exit angle of the lower wound, I'm guessing that the wound in the neck is the actual entrance wound, and I would dispute that it was a gunshot wound to begin with. It looks more like he was pierced with a spear-like object. If that is a gunshot exit wound and the entrance was in the front under the collar bone, the entrance would have to have been on the right side under the collar bone — which means that our victim had his mediastinum transected, the aortic arch blown out, possibly the superior vena cava. The wound would have been almost instantly fatal. He doesn't look dead to me.

Color me a little bit skeptical.
*Jaw Drops*
Thems some real Prutty words there mister
:tiphat:
In Capitalism, Man exploits Man. In Communism, it's just the reverse
User avatar
The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts: 26885
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Accidentally Shot With 45-70 (pic)

Post by The Annoyed Man »

marksiwel wrote:*Jaw Drops*
Thems some real Prutty words there mister
:tiphat:
:lol: Thankee, thankee.

I worked in an ER for nearly 6 years, and I've seen a whole lot of gunshot wounds.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
User avatar
Excaliber
Moderator
Posts: 6199
Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 9:59 pm
Location: DFW Metro

Re: Accidentally Shot With 45-70 (pic)

Post by Excaliber »

The Annoyed Man wrote:If this is the exit wound from a round that entered under his collarbone (which is on the front of his body), what is that nearly as large second wound in the back of his neck? There are no bony structures in the human body located between ribs on the front and the scapula on the rear that would be substantial enough to cause a 325 grain 45-70 ballistic tip which entered at point blank range to fragment into two pieces, causing two separate and equally devastating exit wounds a foot and a half apart (when the entrance wound is only 12-13 inches away. Also, the lower wound's upper right quadrant forms a nearly perfect right angle, indicating that there was flesh trimmed away with a scalpel for medical/surgical reasons — which means that this wound was not originally as large. And finally, given the apparent exit angle of the lower wound, I'm guessing that the wound in the neck is the actual entrance wound, and I would dispute that it was a gunshot wound to begin with. It looks more like he was pierced with a spear-like object. If that is a gunshot exit wound and the entrance was in the front under the collar bone, the entrance would have to have been on the right side under the collar bone — which means that our victim had his mediastinum transected, the aortic arch blown out, possibly the superior vena cava. The wound would have been almost instantly fatal. He doesn't look dead to me.

Color me a little bit skeptical.
I agree that the story doesn't match the picture. The upper wound appears to have a feature that could be the entry wound at the lower left quadrant. The lower wound would be consistent with an exit wound.

The fact that he is still alive would support a hypothesis that the bullet entered at his neck, traveled through muscle tissue in his back and shoulder, and exited through the lower wound, missing the mediastinum completely. It would be difficult to come up with a story for how the victim's body was positioned in a manner that allowed a discharge from the fall of a rifle leaning on a four wheeler to align both body and rifle bore to create the wounds we see.

I suppose it's possible that the victim was bent at a 90 degree angle at the waist and the rifle was discharged when it was just past parallel with the ground by pressure on the trigger from something on the bike well before the gun hit the ground, but I'd want to see pics of the bike, rifle, and incident site before I'd buy that one.

I'm with AnnoyedMan in the skeptical column. I'd like to say to the witness, "let's go over how that happened one more time in a little more detail......"
Excaliber

"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." - Jeff Cooper
I am not a lawyer. Nothing in any of my posts should be construed as legal or professional advice.
old farmer
Senior Member
Posts: 601
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 10:00 am
Location: The Great State of Texas

Re: Accidentally Shot With 45-70 (pic)

Post by old farmer »

The Annoyed Man wrote:If this is the exit wound from a round that entered under his collarbone (which is on the front of his body), what is that nearly as large second wound in the back of his neck? There are no bony structures in the human body located between ribs on the front and the scapula on the rear that would be substantial enough to cause a 325 grain 45-70 ballistic tip which entered at point blank range to fragment into two pieces, causing two separate and equally devastating exit wounds a foot and a half apart (when the entrance wound is only 12-13 inches away. Also, the lower wound's upper right quadrant forms a nearly perfect right angle, indicating that there was flesh trimmed away with a scalpel for medical/surgical reasons — which means that this wound was not originally as large. And finally, given the apparent exit angle of the lower wound, I'm guessing that the wound in the neck is the actual entrance wound, and I would dispute that it was a gunshot wound to begin with. It looks more like he was pierced with a spear-like object. If that is a gunshot exit wound and the entrance was in the front under the collar bone, the entrance would have to have been on the right side under the collar bone — which means that our victim had his mediastinum transected, the aortic arch blown out, possibly the superior vena cava. The wound would have been almost instantly fatal. He doesn't look dead to me.

Color me a little bit skeptical.
:tiphat: :iagree:

I am a Level 1 Trauma Nurse. It appear like the entrance point may be the Lower left wound. A weopon close(3 feet) to a person wound would have burn area which require debridement. The picture is a post surgury (7-10 days?). The bullet appeared to tunnel under the skin and exit at neck. If that is the true then the individual could have survived. This induvidual is extremely lucky.
God Bliss America.
User avatar
The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts: 26885
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Accidentally Shot With 45-70 (pic)

Post by The Annoyed Man »

That's a good observation. I actually didn't take into account that the incision lines on the lower wound might be from debriding burned skin.

The only GSW like this I saw were A) a bad guy who had multiple GSW from a .41 magnum with hollowpoints with a fist sized exit wound; and B) a few different patients with point blank shotgun wounds. A 12 gauge fired within a few inches of the skin will make an entrance wound like that. But as you undoubtedly know, most gunshot wounds, even exit wounds caused by hollow points just aren't anywhere near as dramatic as the damage in this picture. What's happening under the skin may be devastating, but the actual entrance and exit holes don't usually look that bad.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
casingpoint
Senior Member
Posts: 1447
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 9:53 pm

Re: Accidentally Shot With 45-70 (pic)

Post by casingpoint »

I've seen a whole lot of gunshot wounds.
Let me as you and old farmer to estimate out of all the hollow point handgun wounds you have seen, what percentage involved bullets which expanded to a significant degree?
dihappy
Senior Member
Posts: 907
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 8:00 pm
Location: San Antonio

Re: Accidentally Shot With 45-70 (pic)

Post by dihappy »

Annoyed,

I asked the same question.
I am the girlfriend of the guy who got shot on Ashley's name. The big hole around his shoulder blade is where the bullet entered and it traveled under his skin and exited right there on his neck! above his spinal cord! Just goes to show that he truly is LUCKY! The ballistic tip mainly just burned the edges of the skin of the wound that you see in the picture. He's getting better & better every day, last night he was even doing push ups!! He's finally able to use his arm again! Somehow it didn't hit anything major and basically ended up being a really bad flesh wound! It is truly a miracle that he is alive and not paralyzed!!!

Or maybe this is the story this guy is tellling his girlfriend and family.
Image
User avatar
The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts: 26885
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Accidentally Shot With 45-70 (pic)

Post by The Annoyed Man »

casingpoint wrote:
I've seen a whole lot of gunshot wounds.
Let me as you and old farmer to estimate out of all the hollow point handgun wounds you have seen, what percentage involved bullets which expanded to a significant degree?
I honestly don't know the degree of expansion for most of them. Probably 65%-75% of the GSWs I saw were from a .22LR bullet — that being the apparent caliber of choice at the time for the Pasadena Knife and Gun Club. Most of the rest were either hardball of various calibers from .25 ACP up to .45 ACP, or lead round nose or semi-wadcutters in .38 Special. Almost all were from pistols. I think I didn't see more than 5 or 6 people shot with rifles in all that time. I remember that one was a 12 year old boy shot through the aorta point blank with a .22 rifle. He died. I remember a woman who had a devastating wound from a .223 bullet falling out of the sky, and I remember another guy who was shot in the head by accident with a .30 caliber rifle bullet. But I saw hundreds of guys shot with pistols — at least one or two a week (sometimes more), times 52 weeks in a year, times almost 6 years.

I worked in that ER from 1979 to 1985, and both the range of available bullet choices and the buyer's sophistication of the typical Californian gang-banger were probably limited compared to today. The first hollowpoint wound I ever saw was actually self-inflicted by a friend of mine who was a Pasadena cop. It was a +P .38 Special hollowpoint, bullet weight unknown to me, but I'm guessing that it was probably whatever was standard fare for LEOs back then who carried .38s. Steve was on patrol as a training officer (to his embarrassment) with a rookie in the car with him when it happened. It was probably around 10:00 to 10:30 p.m., and he was stopped at a red light. He just happened to look in his side mirror in time to see some guy jump out of his car about 4 cars back in the lane and rush forward to Steve's car on the driver's side. Steve drew his weapon inside the patrol car and kind of tucked it under his left armpit, out of sight but available if necessary. It turned out the other guy just wanted directions. When Steve was reholstering his revolver, it discharged point blank high into his right thigh. The bullet hit nothing but skin and muscle, and exited on the inside of his right knee, continued at a slight downward angle, hit the firewall, and ricocheted upward into the radio equipment behind the dashboard, where it did nobody any favors.

Other than a nasty infection caused by pieces of holster and clothing having been blown into the wound cavity which required 2 or 3 days of IV antibiotics, he was fine. I never saw the bullet itself, but Steve told me later that it was pretty mangled. The rookie who was in the car with him was shaken, but performed admirably. Several of us from the ER staff were in the radio room waiting for an expected call from a paramedic ambulance that was rolling on another call, and our scanner picked up the radio call from the rookie, saying he had an officer down and needed help. Steve told me the next morning when I visited him in his hospital room that while he was laying on the ground waiting for the ambulance to show up, he told the rookie, "What I just did there... ...don't do that!"

All of that is to say that the exit wound, while marginally larger than the entrance wound, was not dramatically larger, and nothing like the wounds in the above pictures. The only other patients I saw that I know were shot with hollowpoints both had through and through wounds from a .41 magnum, and they were actually home invasion robbers who had their gun taken away from them by a former Green Beret who happened to be upstairs at the time they kicked in the door. He confronted one of the BGs at the top of the stairs, disarmed him and kicked his butt 6 times before he hit the ground, threw him down the stairs and shot him twice on the way down, killing him. He then ran down the stairs and shot the other BG who was slapping his old mother around downstairs.

The first BG was DOA. One of the bullets had hit him in the upper arm, breaking his humerus. The second bullet hit him right over the heart in front and exited through his right kidney in the back. The kidney had been pretty much vaporized. The exit hole was about the size of the lower wound in the above photo, except that it was at a much deeper angle, and you can imagine that it had pretty much destroyed every organ in its path.

The second BG survived about a week. He was hit twice in the left flank, both bullets passing through his abdomen and exiting on the far side. It basically turned his digestive tract into menudo, and he suffered terribly before dying of a massive infection. The sizes of the exit wounds on the second guy were significant, but not nearly as dramatic as the one on the other guy. I don't know why. I assume that the bullets were all recovered, since this occurred inside a home and the police would have looked for them, but I never saw them. I can only assume that they were hollowpoints because the exit wounds were so much larger than the entrance wounds.

Also, at that particular time in my life, I had a completely different take on guns than I have now. I was raised in a family of liberal academics, and my attitudes were typical of that culture. Consequently, I didn't know all that much about guns at the time (except that they were eeeeeeeeeevil), and I knew next to nothing about bullet technology except that I knew the difference between an FMJ and a JHP. But it would have never occurred to me at the time to be interested in the degree of bullet expansion. I was more focused on the damage the bullet caused, and on my duties as part of the team that took care of people who had been shot. The ER I worked in was also a level 1 trauma center, but this was 30 years ago, and I'm sure that both the state of the art and the technology available today are much higher than they were back then. Old Farmer can probably better answer the question of degree of expansion than I can.

I only know that hollowpoints work.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
KD5NRH
Senior Member
Posts: 3119
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 3:25 am
Location: Stephenville TX

Re: Accidentally Shot With 45-70 (pic)

Post by KD5NRH »

old farmer wrote:I am a Level 1 Trauma Nurse. It appear like the entrance point may be the Lower left wound.
That's what I was guessing, based on the bruise extending upward from it towards the neck wound.

Either way, that looks like it was excruciatingly painful to start with, I don't even want to think about the debridement.

Things like that are why I want a tattoo on my chest that says "If it needs more than some Neosporin and gauze, keep me drugged unconscious until it heals." That will come right after "Resuscitate. Repeat as needed - I will tell you when to stop."
casingpoint
Senior Member
Posts: 1447
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 9:53 pm

Re: Accidentally Shot With 45-70 (pic)

Post by casingpoint »

Thanks for that reply, Annoyed Man. Much better reading than the Houston Chomical this morning. This info is hard to come by, hardly being the kind of thing that lends itself to clinical trials. The FBI denim over gel test is misleading as to actual performance. I'm under the impression that expansion of lighter bullets fired in many shooting of humans are quickly deformed and deflected by impacting bone, but as least rise to the level of wadcutters, which is more desirable than roundnose. Many consider a wadcutter entirely adequate for self defense, and I tend to agree. The issue of handgun bullet expansion in the human body remains largely unresolved. Thanks again.
Post Reply

Return to “Off-Topic”