Federal Health Police

[5thGenTexan]

Second, what does this have to do with guns and gun issues?

While I agree this is probably nothing, why are you so concerned with trying to police what the moderators have clearly chosen to allow?

It's just a shame that the moderators just recently decided to reject their rule about limiting the talk about guns or gun related issues. They dont like the president, so they decided to change the rules to turn this into a free for all section. It was just nice to go somewhere and talk about second ammendment issues without it turning into a tin-foil-hat-wearing cesspool. Hey, it is their board and they can run it anyway they seem fit.

And if you don't like it you have the right to change the channel. Our 2nd ammendement rights and all others are intertwined if we lose one we can lose them all. I don't intend to let a leftist lawyer from Chicago tear down what our ancesters have built.

[Keith B]

OK, I think the message has been passed. Back on discussion of the topic posted.

[TexasGal]

Pretty sure TAM covered it well, as did Keith and Chas, so I'll keep this one short, and throw out a thanks to all involved in running this forum, including the quality posters from which I have learned much over the years.

No complaints from this corner! Thanks, Mods for doing an awesome job! Now, back to our regularly scheduled discussion.

[Abraham]

"He said the section spells out and defines an armed Federal "Health Corps" complete with search and seizure powers"

Under what circumstances would the so-called "Health Corps" be searching for or seizing?

Tobacco products?

Fatty Foodstuff?

Firearms - cuz we know they're bad for your health...

Or, are are they there to enforce insurance buying compliance by the recalcitrant citizenry?